From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IDE Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:03:03 +0300 Message-ID: <56201487.7050202@yandex.ru> References: <83fv1r3gzp.fsf@gnu.org> <83bncf3f9k.fsf@gnu.org> <5610E0BC.8090902@online.de> <83si5r106e.fsf@gnu.org> <831td9z18h.fsf@gnu.org> <5612E996.7090700@yandex.ru> <83bnc7tavr.fsf@gnu.org> <5618C92A.3040207@yandex.ru> <83a8rrt9ag.fsf@gnu.org> <871tcyexa9.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> <87612a7my2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <561DC925.5050001@siege-engine.com> <87fv1d6fdf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <561E44FB.2030508@gmail.com> <561F2049.1030700@yandex.ru> <561FA547.5030901@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444943039 3746 80.91.229.3 (15 Oct 2015 21:03:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 21:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Ludlam , David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 15 23:03:45 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmpgf-0008R9-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:03:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49641 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmpge-00043Q-8C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmpg7-0003go-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmpg3-0001lM-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]:34318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmpg3-0001kN-ET; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: by lfaz124 with SMTP id z124so48606690lfa.1; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:03:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mi+hoA3dWSYJtfj6bMaILJNPrgU11gDKt6/KJ+c4ynY=; b=WnyDBdhNcXPhA0G21j6uXDHGU9S5IkdnaTXPwI2mjVnlWIaBSAbLtQCCScro0jiou+ W2EvBMX6bQvyRane9Z+a4A+heC6hT1LEvM+hfAeDqNUvs97rcKqlRmgzqGLrXXzmqZhc sGudPeP8BbYql7Sdv9X2zMG1gvfX032E9qndXo5uhqe8q/YJ4mt1t/upnrNonsPWY5JM Oa7ahGdLSkGOajCr+aIz/ptd6LRrj7T1xbDCJ0yJnwdsv9ftDnDpuL57nGjXlk71CTFJ QvsaxNAQCGUcKVsQRuytddsnjq4mRrY+kTYApnVWjStErb47DRO+tnMjDTaZqEwaVkSp Ubgw== X-Received: by 10.180.210.210 with SMTP id mw18mr828519wic.18.1444942986673; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id gd10sm18595945wjb.47.2015.10.15.14.03.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:03:05 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <561FA547.5030901@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191686 Archived-At: On 10/15/2015 04:08 PM, Eric Ludlam wrote: > Indeed. That is a similarity. Not an accidental one. > Some, such as 'version' and 'name' seem trivial, but become more > convenient when you start browsing through your open projects. I'm not saying there aren't useful, just not essential. > Different projects handle this differently. The original set regarding > both Automake and Makefile based projects are as you describe. I see. And the distinction is managed by the ede-find-subproject-for-directory implementation. > You can 'customize' the project and > just fill in the blanks for your build system, include-path and others, > or just ignore it all. How does one customize an instance of the generic project? > You will note other tools that wrangle data now use defstruct (now part > of emacs) or seem to create their own data structure with their own > accessors, so building such tools is not unusual. I just tried to make > mine more generally useful. Sure.