From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Przemys=c5=82aw_Wojnowski?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IDE Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:34:58 +0200 Message-ID: <561A6582.10908@cumego.com> References: <5610207A.2000300@harpegolden.net> <83fv1r3gzp.fsf@gnu.org> <83bncf3f9k.fsf@gnu.org> <5610E0BC.8090902@online.de> <83si5r106e.fsf@gnu.org> <831td9z18h.fsf@gnu.org> <5612E996.7090700@yandex.ru> <83bnc7tavr.fsf@gnu.org> <5618C92A.3040207@yandex.ru> <83a8rrt9ag.fsf@gnu.org> <5618D376.1080700@yandex.ru> <831td3t62e.fsf@gnu.org> <561A6199.1020901@cumego.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444570530 7668 80.91.229.3 (11 Oct 2015 13:35:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 13:35:30 +0000 (UTC) To: Jean-Christophe Helary , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 11 15:35:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlGmY-0001d8-BN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:35:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlGmX-0005Te-JC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:35:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlGmH-0005SD-1N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlGmD-0007ac-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp23.iq.pl ([86.111.242.228]:48719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlGmC-0007Zj-PF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 31458 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2015 13:34:59 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.106]) (esperanto@cumego.com@[159.205.196.239]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp22.iq.pl with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 11 Oct 2015 13:34:59 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.111.242.228 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191224 Archived-At: W dniu 11.10.2015 o 15:26, Jean-Christophe Helary pisze: > Productivity for code *writers* could be defined by how many correct code strings they output in a given amount of time. > > Anything that > > 1) increase the volume > 2) increase the correctness > > of the strings increases productivity. I like jokes, but adding your "list of features" would be great too. ;-)