From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:36:25 +0200 Message-ID: <56136BE9.6020302@online.de> References: <5610207A.2000300@harpegolden.net> <83fv1r3gzp.fsf@gnu.org> <83bncf3f9k.fsf@gnu.org> <5610E0BC.8090902@online.de> <83si5r106e.fsf@gnu.org> <831td9z18h.fsf@gnu.org> <56134E71.6070704@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444113427 28091 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2015 06:37:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Nathan , Dmitry Gutov To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 06 08:36:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjLrt-0007df-Jw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:36:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49218 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjLrs-0002Rs-LG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 02:36:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjLrd-0002RY-3u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 02:36:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjLrV-0001T5-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 02:36:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:57702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjLrV-0001T1-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 02:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([77.6.171.187]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LdEht-1aRAvC3DlZ-00iV4Q; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:36:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <56134E71.6070704@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6vFhjJdmwZ5U16QT6PFgLKLx8SWKkrxXnHZ3myMTKy7DjFU5lhk cGeKzKOr/nDg4VbyAmBqjN1//LdjcCIqPKxzRZUbs3XCu0+kOIVCark32Kot4VotXjRxMmy 4shywN4ueAKR3P5aLH1Ij3kwr5x54/ph84nPO5ZV+7v59Rl6P+E2/MGOBp1I/l4Mh4TMuFU wb0jkwhB45d4SpxcsN6sg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:nqfJGgdZZ/Y=:05ZG+IUr9wRDx4FqSHuiEN c1BjQ5UvA1vlKy851wTSrgHyqp2TQ0aiqHarIxGjS2Yx+AxW02Nv9XMZDJ1KPX/rTCGnNbkJK NCp45BlOA30eHhCVsm6zRrUtkx4o/NOj2SFh7Y+Floj4zLeWS2qN2D2/o32ulP1OqX+jJz4n5 VXvaMjHiD5H8DzXy3kopaCzTbM3pB++RKwNAGAHgGPJ6Lom9iS5ZsTdQeYXnNunDh1v3/kpDd cTkgFhsKR8GIaUNSGxn3OCQO9NW032FZiVVGCIWF9RaHwJxZmV4FiqL5O/6hP9Tg2yw/CS+OF 55DvzAcVhhmP/emJ8PUvGkyL4Mm2+o/E4uPy77HYmDOVCeD0VdlC8J34UgWRMh97GQLrJWp25 spYmKE8tsrPJ9Bo7FpH2HCAJLhvoDKP9AswVj+12s4+7CwqN6r8fzFtnSiJY07cOdRHLCwCuG ZfOBFphnSTRcqirC6vqxbJLMB5VWo8WEhtXRnqbNpm1phgptuqpuGPBt4V3uCKyWiQ0e1qh2z zJzv0EXFY4cQDu9rN2z2Hg0zzBZp7e0rBqsqvVwpmsSdLlJvLZt9a6NchM/4Mt07bAppvxh6E k0HMhyUQXrkI9UdL2cIfYipAovLv2cRbBUvqurEiOIISrvpJ5TlPVP/cw06hGOs+MToepaDba jXno8ffaBGpDPaUtG2GU5e4padtl/uY0GC/A9LPLXLK05MMN7rNfctaUoxh8ha7rvsnsbY5k0 59Zw/xT1iel0JLji X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.13 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191000 Archived-At: Am 06.10.2015 um 06:30 schrieb Dmitry Gutov: > On 10/06/2015 04:15 AM, Paul Nathan wrote: > >> Using SLIME and the Rust completion user interfaces is still a subpar >> UI experience compared to IntelliJ or VS. > > You might want to clarify that statement in more detail. Creating a > bug report would be best. Decisions where to head into these area train considerable investments. Complex questions can't be rolled into a simple bug-report. Also it surpasses a feature request. If Emacs wants to keep path in nowadays evolving world, it needs to adapt its discussion-format.