From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:48:20 +0300 Message-ID: <5612E214.8040904@yandex.ru> References: <560CCEBA.9080607@online.de> <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> <87lhbmkrle.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si5r22qh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5612CEA6.3010809@yandex.ru> <87egh95cze.fsf@gmail.com> <5612D36B.1030906@yandex.ru> <87a8rx5awg.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444078115 23906 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2015 20:48:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:48:35 +0000 (UTC) To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 05 22:48:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCgQ-0006g5-IK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:48:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47700 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCgP-0000Vw-TL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:48:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCgM-0000Vl-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:48:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCgI-0002Bv-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:48:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:36912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCgI-0002Bi-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:48:22 -0400 Original-Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so131669129wic.0 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:48:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MDCx7FHK23Z9/TV8XMn3xAcAgMBA+ux6mKgJyi2Wg/8=; b=pjjKcHB6BphT57UzoPiHx+ENcm++W83QY2LeOwYKn9xAZdFBBI9T6b/n/RtHzi4L8H ONaraH3MCCKx1/aXFWW4PKRXy7Nd6gl4tUDCQqMb84LNkMJPpgMUZh2XQZmaM7XLOSmG pcdxbXzPURdYG9Xud48FGmlJK069Q0M1E/TfWoUrZVV13Y0UXb6hzMNK8Bu/kezxK0I+ crs/L/3ioatC5ECO3ZPAJkWz12XYQ2iiQ/QSltAUbgo0obDrYx3RgdMX2fnyhW6AVg5v Z9Go5n+ccMbZU1wW1ViVHG/VggUyj49nRNqZJJ7IDMg/eSkMGu2JMZs9ZN0SQsRhph91 PIOQ== X-Received: by 10.180.8.164 with SMTP id s4mr14435126wia.5.1444078102296; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id hk5sm28788486wjb.6.2015.10.05.13.48.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:48:21 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <87a8rx5awg.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190971 Archived-At: On 10/05/2015 11:16 PM, Jay Belanger wrote: > That's the point. It sounded like Richard was saying that in that case, > Emacs shouldn't take advantage of it. How else could Right. Since the GCC support would only be "theoretical". >> If it really works usefully with GCC -- if that is not just a theoretical >> idea -- then I won't object to its supporting other compilers as well. > > be interpreted? Works usefully with GCC *now*, or whenever the feature in question is introduced. While I personally disagree with that stance, it's good to understand clearly the current state of this issue.