From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 22:25:26 +0300 Message-ID: <5612CEA6.3010809@yandex.ru> References: <560CCEBA.9080607@online.de> <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> <87lhbmkrle.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si5r22qh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444073149 7927 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2015 19:25:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:25:49 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 05 21:25:45 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBOH-0004Fc-Sz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:25:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47339 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBOH-0008Vg-7a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBOA-0008VO-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBO5-0001ko-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:25:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]:38495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjBO5-0001kf-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so129220792wic.1 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:25:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=osxrrJBQKRU/owTvv64BjgTm7xJ7Ouqb3GfBj7//h7I=; b=KhksYU3pbx7xfnSTLzG+kDXF+ZLlE3/OvG2WnyUbg0IZ2uf8Os1VwBRr6MXOhD9bgS xuQJATGUVRuLubLThcjBfMaIjH/fnlLt3WsS6yZTqAQrD/2SdeNE1ZodYQ2DiPWV9meM 325vD+Pw4MxuvP5bWB1Xq0TIPnPfMsYJQEZAq3CAoHDtj1VTj3VyCV2onAIaHDAHu7a/ 2h/J/Woy2S7xyswstjaG0VrReChIbnuUEa34qy9UD65vlUwM1E+QSOaoAUlJpBk86T+u ZuP60wHT2e9Z/E0KMggjPXZN+kQ9cmpnnDI6wX7MiKoPcYxdru1WrJu/YNpA/5KO2ktc owfg== X-Received: by 10.194.104.137 with SMTP id ge9mr31600257wjb.57.1444073129071; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id cv4sm28492650wjc.17.2015.10.05.12.25.27 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:25:27 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190961 Archived-At: On 10/05/2015 10:20 PM, John Wiegley wrote: > Any solution we choose should never preclude the opportunity for GCC to > outshine other choices. The main thing is that it is GCC's responsibility to > be better, and not Emacs' to prevent better options from being chosen, simply > to accommodate a lack of progress by GCC. I'm assuming that's exactly what Richard meant by "theoretical idea". At least, it's how similar discussions went in the past.