From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: burden of maintainance Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:54:41 +0200 Message-ID: <560ED2F1.1080603@online.de> References: <560CEA6A.9000907@online.de> <834miaa847.fsf@gnu.org> <87twq9a3d3.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8337xt75ok.fsf@gnu.org> <560E9BF1.4070106@online.de> <83io6p5mi3.fsf@gnu.org> <560EBCA3.7060609@online.de> <838u7l5ek2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443813116 451 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 19:11:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 19:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 21:11:41 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi5k3-0006wl-A3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 21:11:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi5k2-0007fb-F4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 15:11:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi5Tk-000271-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:54:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi5Tj-0007zF-3x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:54:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:50162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi5Tf-0007xE-5L; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([95.119.55.225]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6rkj-1acEvk41f3-00woIk; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:54:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <838u7l5ek2.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:J/j+ar43+DkajbG2WLBSLe8jr4I0O3BntRHvhub2uT8zn4TP955 7YrbkgQWfs7YBeYUnkNQMRIQ+6gYR2IJo7CKEyDDadWjzK727MbZ+GHOuaxxNwtFDBy9hwQ 4EVYTXVdu5+qVt7sj+iGx5L2X+kCeQ1ibCRR8qntX0ouQWrTjOdHW+hJ7V8wZgM/4hbG4TL 0gs8zi0OxLFwSFWxh99oA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2ljL1IzeamM=:udGnRF315IdDyuprkh053R kFjvdrC+/NIZ8+TN1UHZjpacEwrLZKC2v4w+wg54g3+XFdJZCKKV7Y1Oq2qMvwqAbKQwo6Pd/ AO4J96/jGEwquWfswPnx3/QRJoyK888deptUsLnVXSp8fmwpD6Xcv8HXgkuBtvho17rb/9ufP 9UB7N8s1kVBNWNY7KwtufXWe50vk1WhbxWpmCo3lRVpElkcv3b1eW7Ai1Y1Dqna7ydnitkH6w HHfUYqLPu22uioRq0L1eEzBYKD1XCpJMIm8/QA7tx/GEx7qL3ybslVdhmmZo51DuMGYWBlAhw utETs5R7VQgjhurggFaZ8PAksatV390J/iBknCeSi12RJXQcCiK5rglTbvEswCH5TL/3U2DFU XrvvHnl1FbYQlzF/UN+23eP8mNJ2L/b78y2wkIhLnS5uXM/KwlydIZTpLygr+G3cB8GKdenjf 0uf0GcX1uJqGLDbygIn1Z4hKLTOxE95vUDGDLbjhaWzHdviQOvWeuqWFgax0hFmgiIgjZcg50 KR9RYyzSYhPUoaghqhyFwSXzCl2LsNHU2uZPrdCXTtm4WUybRO/OgMU+QjpkIEu9xxQG9XcBw GlzufItBkHjcu8hecC0N5nWH+vahtaE+Qzx/3fPiMIE0At8pV262MkwNDLRc5BZ5zjKZ17zO5 17Ap0nm+CskoxOqALa0i824I31DfOfE6vcf1iv3j/AUC+TQuIC4HRpW9qMktuEZBd7SoyDqNt tSKH9kDyiTz+KtAs X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.131 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190738 Archived-At: Am 02.10.2015 um 20:08 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 19:19:31 +0200 >> From: Andreas Röhler >> CC: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >>>> If there is no test, writing the test before any other proceeding should >>>> save a lot of time. >>> I agree. The problem is in practice, not in principle. >>> >>> >> What about creating a co-maintainance WRT code-quality? > Good idea. We will need a clear description of the job and one or > more volunteers. > > Also considerably pay-off should be gained by reducing redundancy - just reading org-mode related comment in thread "Should we just start dumping cl-lib?"