From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter Dyballa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:55:57 +0200 Message-ID: <560E9570-DDB2-4008-9E47-CEB2E631B783@Freenet.DE> References: <8763unt4nz.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208026592 14818 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2008 18:56:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Sven Joachim To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 12 20:57:05 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JkkuI-0004bL-56 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:56:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkkte-0004jk-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkkta-0004jU-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JkktW-0004iB-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JkktW-0004i4-NL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkktW-0004Vz-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JkktV-0003l0-Uo for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkktQ-0004UK-EV for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([195.4.92.91]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkktQ-0004Tk-0H; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.4.92.23] (helo=13.mx.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JkktN-0000cH-A0; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:56:01 +0200 Original-Received: from fcd11.f.ppp-pool.de ([195.4.205.17]:55055 helo=[192.168.1.2]) by 13.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID peter_dyballa@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #12) id 1JkktN-000180-0u; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:56:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95070 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21997 Archived-At: Am 12.04.2008 um 19:24 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: > Maybe I completely misunderstand the issue at hand: are we talking > about files in the build directory or in the install directory? > ("make clean" is relevant to the former, not the latter.) About both. Because the DOC files in the build tree are also installed. > > If Peter and you are talking about the build directory, then the > previous DOC should probably be removed, but do we really want the > build number NOT to be incremented anyway? I want to have control over this mechanism. Usually I want to have only one build number version (and I don't want to waste time by re- configuring again after a 'make distclean' or such). Because when it happens that I start over, none of the installed superfluous DOC files and Emacs versions are de-installed. This worked until some day in winter, in February, I think. Then the etc/DOC-$ {version}.buildnumber files were saved and new ones with incremented build numbers were created, and sometimes also installed when I did not pay attention. This seems to have changed recently (I am still waiting for a 'make bootstrap' to finish) ... -- Greetings Pete Behold the warranty ... the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.