From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Adrian Robert" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode enhancement for Objective-C Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 09:08:36 +0300 Message-ID: <55f7df060710132308t6cb0d145taea3a916e19d6896@mail.gmail.com> References: <55f7df060710122343j6cc17fc8qa73ef5964fc4068a@mail.gmail.com> <20071013211325.GA1908@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192342139 24615 80.91.229.12 (14 Oct 2007 06:08:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 06:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alan Mackenzie" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 14 08:08:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Igwef-0005H3-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 08:08:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgweY-0008RE-6J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:08:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IgweV-0008Qa-DC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:08:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IgweU-0008PN-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgweT-0008PK-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.188]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IgweT-0006ES-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:08:37 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so1045418rvf for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:08:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=azzwO6A6PuOhmGqwMYXWGmIpRdIytpJqReodmpis72Y=; b=Hp+uYXvkWI6tlY4aliYFRueR+YWI1hEqn6wragsDZvIvQnIYc8acFaY2ozZci+TSivNu2LzEtZXCIDsq11mNmda316KrEfo4qt4AbrNd5/3hY5h3sVYImApc3yRCNaICVETlx7aXzxLV7Nn457vJZR/lqWKEAJga5vBS+zzdMYY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ttt+EOJzDgKvtnKLWQLiDAU5ThK0blhWr9fhXs7UWCXLF2x+u/cVYNB7gkHZPuyy9mNofbDOHNbYhHGwkLqF05oMVkISLs2WX9mHub3XfZFdMBbFihS/gbotZbFKkTiocLRPXRNoFBe/fsGZ/OFiE0VWJTlx4A5q/wf6xCmFtn0= Original-Received: by 10.141.20.7 with SMTP id x7mr2225230rvi.1192342116210; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.141.164.19 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:08:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20071013211325.GA1908@muc.de> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80840 Archived-At: On 10/14/07, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hallo, Adrian: > Could I ask you two little favours? > (i) Please prefix the names of all the variables with "c-"; e.g., change > objc-method-arg-min-delta-to-bracket to > c-objc-method-arg-min-delta-to-bracket. OK.. it's been a while since I did this patch, so I'm not sure, I think I may have been following the naming of "objc-method-intro", "objc-method-args-cont", "objc-method-call-count" in cc-vars. However I see these seem to be a different type of variable. So the different naming convention should be used? Or is it best to change the older three variables to 'c-objc-...'? For now, here is a context diff version of the patch as-is. -Adrian