From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Adrian Robert" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-backend mechanism on Windows and Mac? Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:53:02 -0400 Message-ID: <55f7df060709130853q25979167p465e8e7591000ca2@mail.gmail.com> References: <46E4F571.3030101@gnu.org> <46E54A83.2070702@gnu.org> <46E54B7B.3070104@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189698841 15985 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2007 15:54:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: "Kenichi Handa" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 13 17:53:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVr0G-0006oM-2W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:53:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVr0F-0006mc-Kq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVr0D-0006mX-BJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVr0B-0006mL-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:53:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVr0A-0006mI-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:53:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.190]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVr0A-0004ro-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:53:10 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so400638rvf for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:53:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=G4OpZbxWaxVOKwk8BwUcWrbaAQbO2DFf4miPX8+XJrY=; b=Qpc0n34amwKlBtB1jMsTjL5NRJ7E6CddZp+r1rjAJPmDSRAw4zcfMqxIHf+82TU7WnQ5TkJX/DC8DdM/LQQjpSmf9r6SKH8ftM4NgCgiPNCUC4AdOO8Xxy6KUEzuq6vbS5YKHcXjpVWVc2t9VhCGk8QHlsq6OusmArb66zNuXQY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UR08uTo5PithzGpY96iRwiVY2NCzwceSoMKkmULbYyNcA0bjLLcCqFuBJiEupexQAdvKmPDNf4CKzlfzyQ5fgxeZc5lLsuqgysWNRKEbWeqCZvGJj8ooNMkOGGrXcsrvfW8TIYbkHML0bPvVv717yMeqX+1gjnRzgYe2BORw3mY= Original-Received: by 10.141.172.6 with SMTP id z6mr16680rvo.1189698787755; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.141.164.19 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78780 Archived-At: On 9/13/07, Kenichi Handa wrote: > In article , Kenichi Handa writes: > > > I confirmed that bug, and found that the problem is not > > specific to Windows port. As there were comments paying > > attention to anti-aliased drawing in xdisp.c, I didn't > > change code for handling overlapping when I committed > > font-backend codes, but I just found that there is a > > fundamental bug. I'm now investigating how to fix it. > > I've just installed fixes for X Window. Could you please > fix w32term.c and w32font.c by the same way as done in > xterm.c and xftfont.c (the diffs are attached)? > > Adrian, I think your Cocoa port needs the similar fix, > doesn't it? I assume it does, however I can't replicate the error as described because dragging windows from other apps over emacs does not cause redraws under my port. (Did I understand the symptom report correctly?) I guess something else causing a redraw could work: Moving cursor over? Dragging mouse selection over? thanks, Adrian