From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 23:53:29 +0300 Message-ID: <55FF1CC9.30605@yandex.ru> References: <87mvwjohyi.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <838u83r6hl.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2rn5ucg.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <837fnmrizs.fsf@gnu.org> <877fnm4wzn.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <876136lr83.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y4g2pxh3.fsf@gnu.org> <871tdulodu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83twqqpu91.fsf@gnu.org> <55FD87DE.3030506@yandex.ru> <83pp1epb17.fsf@gnu.org> <55FD9E4D.8080909@yandex.ru> <83lhc2pae8.fsf@gnu.org> <55FDBB3B.1070706@yandex.ru> <878u82ru1j.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83h9mppqqn.fsf@gnu.org> <55FEB04C.4090205@yandex.ru> <83a8shp2n3.fsf@gnu.org> <8337y9ow3v.fsf@gnu.org> <831tdtovv3.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpvkop4r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442785124 6209 80.91.229.3 (20 Sep 2015 21:38:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 21:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 20 23:38:40 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdmJj-00035A-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 23:38:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdleR-0006Mn-Cf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:55:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdlcW-0005oW-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdlcR-0000Gl-Bq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]:34281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdlcR-0000GM-50; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:53:55 -0400 Original-Received: by lahg1 with SMTP id g1so57727972lah.1; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K2vct/maAJYXBEhM/pqKGYVZf8ijCWy7E8wWZAwZeZc=; b=imENSoB/0bSHsaNE5PhpCQI3lZxkQa/nacHQpi91AsN8YVMiiVrkYGaqF1r/YhRwjw gXchLGvQiimRkr/9U+Cl1N1NtIyorMyYSx+kJOX7rg0t0slw4Gf7UgogqDQRKs3kOxUS itewrPhMKWJbDtNxgxzU+YhbZH8wBJLsp1LrTJAnlEnGU/w4ebssLecr4UiJ6K3613sE H2dcss+gqVLKMhJobLysGA0iaymSx2jj7Ugc37JN2uTyV8ApTT6WEDbnPsowLaKdwkgo sdkXDc2/9GaaFcQ2dp0NWeWV9MRyKYCxyzAxgxSOIWiAMBsnmprj27avIQKsVVs6eDSr LrCQ== X-Received: by 10.112.36.229 with SMTP id t5mr6286009lbj.61.1442782434385; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id jf8sm3026848lbc.12.2015.09.20.13.53.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:53:53 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <83wpvkop4r.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190156 Archived-At: On 09/20/2015 10:40 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Once again, specifying a revision at check-in time is not limited to > RCS, it is also supported by CVS and SCCS. The point of freeing C-u (to be used for something else) still stands.