From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 19:05:50 +0300 Message-ID: <55FD87DE.3030506@yandex.ru> References: <87mvwjohyi.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <838u83r6hl.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2rn5ucg.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <837fnmrizs.fsf@gnu.org> <877fnm4wzn.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <876136lr83.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y4g2pxh3.fsf@gnu.org> <871tdulodu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83twqqpu91.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442678798 8489 80.91.229.3 (19 Sep 2015 16:06:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 19 18:06:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdKek-0008QE-OE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:06:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46858 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdKek-0003aP-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:06:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdKeX-0003aE-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:06:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdKeU-0004hy-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:06:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]:35433) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdKeU-0004g5-FE; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: by lbpo4 with SMTP id o4so36824497lbp.2; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 09:06:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AMJLhk4L9yNm0zWTitJHCyiCVaTb2lzMrbxetVYTu5Y=; b=WliIC0N35/oz5PWV8aVQnxWehokUyIb2EoKndpP+PwGviaO4hvWTMjJVVrHURV2A8Z Q+4SNE4h9YXevyk3y4OO7MdpepRgjnowsGRzt44W0k/cGnDiASwcvJPSp3DEdwCZPi68 HEAh6dEGuzwjOiuv7+SCQSIopGT3+6DC2JEIy3LCE7VobUhXZpAZx2PdKeGCY8Ygo7qg Nl5gXYg1C3W8TMJWJLZBeRZnAjDzWTYjRW+sCY2YtUSdRt7GU1HsxTISd6vF2Rwt4emW 0AleM7Y91K+etungp+4Nsd4yigdbzQWXrT42ko+a05U2xYAbbskeiQRCP2uKLNgT5x+X KLCg== X-Received: by 10.112.36.229 with SMTP id t5mr4936777lbj.61.1442678773439; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 09:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm2198691lab.20.2015.09.19.09.06.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Sep 2015 09:06:12 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <83twqqpu91.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190103 Archived-At: On 09/19/2015 01:40 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I already resurrected it. > > The motivation for removing that functionality was that it complicates > the back-ends. I've made the REVISION argument to back-end's checkin > method optional and silently ignored by back-ends that don't support > it, so I don't think the back-ends should be affected, except by > having that optional ignored arg. Can't the user switch to the desired branch manually, with vc-retrieve-tag, before doing the checkin? If they can, maybe there's no need in taking the step back and reversing the cleanup.