On 09/15/2015 06:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> writes:
> 
>> On 09/15/2015 01:45 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> So having our binary interfaces and calling conventions and
>>> memory/exception handling default to "like Emacs does" is not just
>>> Lisp-friendly but is also keeping our license enforcement options more
>>> conservative. 
>>
>> I don't see how.
> 
> Maybe you should have read more than a single paragraph then.

Maybe you shouldn't snip the part where I explain how the rest of your
argument is incorrect.