From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: progmodes/project.el and search paths Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:42:07 +0300 Message-ID: <55C1DA6F.1000209@yandex.ru> References: <55BE209F.1000009@siege-engine.com> <55BE509B.2080307@yandex.ru> <87r3nkjxby.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <55BF7619.1050701@yandex.ru> <87mvy8jvlh.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <55BF8522.4010009@yandex.ru> <87lhdsys13.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <55BFF764.2030002@yandex.ru> <83mvy7tbit.fsf@gnu.org> <55C0FEEB.7040500@yandex.ru> <83h9oeudfs.fsf@gnu.org> <55C1074E.90103@yandex.ru> <83d1z2uach.fsf@gnu.org> <55C11D54.9090105@yandex.ru> <83bnemtpop.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438767745 24688 80.91.229.3 (5 Aug 2015 09:42:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 09:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de, eric@siege-engine.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 05 11:42:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMvDG-00028h-8z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 11:42:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMvDF-0000CF-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 05:42:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMvDC-0000C9-Ix for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 05:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMvD8-0000Rh-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 05:42:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]:35653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMvD8-0000Ra-Ai; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 05:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: by labkb6 with SMTP id kb6so3070834lab.2; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:42:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nIX46yjK4Z2Nbrrhkc5ZOfHCkUuswK10XICKw9IhzZk=; b=ra7C3Burl/WjrXZd6fQ9qTRtnhoDY30zHhoBVUvIGY8hUYg3A55t8nKDmEhzFXBnbn FGxhsQNKsWsHaNojZCNUZTW86GmMTGmDDjlLslNUnak4cjt+mQyIKMT4htmOgPa7W4du rrFrSxNK8P99aIcvELn3yxXNFRmSXYIihLSQv40CHmEY4rhX3yNDmT7dXLAwZO3uODhE wdqI5Bi3If8RVdo0+Vm/u+TenZhtLGYCwq4o/qUQ1JHUyhYHSVTwhzebJPX/8qnDbhT7 6SmDEI6wmgZxQfDizlrbp2ldmQaFHAsa4Tllb/7l4RqH8X9OPeIMsNNZF3+Iqy59RCb3 wr4w== X-Received: by 10.152.22.129 with SMTP id d1mr8623671laf.13.1438767729448; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id rp10sm434417lbb.8.2015.08.05.02.42.08 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:42:08 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/40.0 In-Reply-To: <83bnemtpop.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188434 Archived-At: On 08/05/2015 05:49 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Yes, for starters. Building the whole project from scratch, including > the manuals, is another. Finding out whether the project _has_ a > manual building instructions is yet another. Project could define a way to build it whole, for instance, without giving out specific information about every goal of build process. Or exposing it all, in a standardized structure, without, however, having the list of specific targets a project can support (manuals, etc) pre-defined. >> Not very interesting, IMHO. > > I don't understand this criterion. I think the criterion should be > "is this useful". Just a criterion for what I spend time on. Do you really consider this on the same of usefulness as, say, xref-find-references?