From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: progmodes/project.el and search paths Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:16:44 +0300 Message-ID: <55BF85DC.5070904@yandex.ru> References: <55BE209F.1000009@siege-engine.com> <55BE509B.2080307@yandex.ru> <87r3nkjxby.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <55BF7619.1050701@yandex.ru> <83bneov272.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438615025 25425 80.91.229.3 (3 Aug 2015 15:17:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eric@siege-engine.com, deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 03 17:17:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMHU0-0003cL-4h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:16:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMHTz-00073y-AK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMHTv-00072k-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:16:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMHTr-00052R-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:16:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:37508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMHTq-00052N-U2; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 11:16:47 -0400 Original-Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so118596280wib.0; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:16:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w8EXJKOS7tEmMD8B0ylfOx2M+C2FbhtKNCvzjwMzJhM=; b=GgnCoIEG7EEFa9gnZ5ZkLlO/Dva+g3z3sVsh8QN1mSBRhCNqh+W1j0Rwdigjw+vCMB qLeTcHN7AJ9lTBt/kiE1FkkKjSO9AYvY8EMKZEuUQvYUx4G0VkrghvFupPuvaJBOVOOn GDgW3sH8euL8AGz710jvVo9bgpuR53p0Vwgo/HrKY/QCekQfMh6tEMpzClOe0qSEQSyt HLpFWdCsp5aDv/Ol8SDmTv185YdcLfUQ7cNBlU05HTmMzc5vl/VUfrd0TLKWnNLmAiiL LY/5b7FSaLm4iPWL13vBDkDREkdqCFn1ZYCGP9JWQemf53RZavXJI8GeDtUHmiVAsc+h As9A== X-Received: by 10.180.107.34 with SMTP id gz2mr22458191wib.77.1438615006390; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id gc4sm14051598wib.23.2015.08.03.08.16.45 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:16:45 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/40.0 In-Reply-To: <83bneov272.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188346 Archived-At: On 08/03/2015 06:09 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I sincerely hope the results of this development will support more > than just Ruby. Obviously. > Most languages today, even those that are "normally" > interpreted, have some kind of compiler. And even Ruby might grow a > compiler some day. I think supporting that is a no-brainer. For all I know, when talking about "supporting a compiler", you and David have entirely different use cases in mind. It'll need a concrete design proposal.