From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tooltips GC overhead Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:00:09 +0200 Message-ID: <55B9BD69.9030200@gmx.at> References: <55B7796B.3070005@gmx.at> <55B87E3F.80708@gmx.at> <55B8E367.9020201@cs.ucla.edu> <55B8F3E9.5000707@gmx.at> <833806yld0.fsf@gnu.org> <55B915CE.7070803@gmx.at> <55B94267.5050208@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438236048 23860 80.91.229.3 (30 Jul 2015 06:00:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 06:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 30 08:00:39 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKgtS-0005Qy-PU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:00:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38048 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKgtS-00044G-33 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:00:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKgtO-00043l-4R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKgtI-0003KT-VV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:00:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:50847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKgtI-0003K8-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 02:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [93.82.15.176] ([93.82.15.176]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhRUQ-1ZYUdu3VrO-00McW4; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:00:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55B94267.5050208@cs.ucla.edu> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3D5Cw19/Y/YrvT2czl4fSBSSmIPh4h0nrL3iTHvuk0eewSbYwjb mwoHdEJEb3ul7IuFxkuLoGnHRrYStzAFbw13oOdepaihiY7xKm1XyU8SeWkoDwpC20q0bi6 YxS9bIBocoAFq7v5dVLIJ7f0Db+1je+nLwlx2IDTeIxZomAxBxQCdbCBEX6F3Hsp/l247Og VxGj8+7B4MxNB583Qg98w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6ftAT7vyKp8=:WUYDlwz/oezyU+XHqStUA7 Vsd1vPYS6Uo32gemgRPfM4diVxIHQwAm+B9iWppWI4MIwugLJRjWeOA8oRIL4XAbropoyOaIr ceFFEXCHjTbbedN1kPaOsb4vWnuE/M48/YWCHltUEFCPJ1SFfyO3YEh8OAhiEENfPsYGkGOXg kcsJJeE/fBb7K9fVFNlE1IB3+Lohg3VqiRR+ds+JPcHO/NzEJjHqVcuLlSkOvnOczi3+X5MCJ vpTZVBTaqbtBh5zbu2+gWLf6g7HhN2kUhOrB+zP/ATQRrEQUlRrl5e4OArNt4tX27H1eAAd/v /5vAFQxU7D60FDVnLvqnZq4fI9Akafy0KfUa+EQdUxz0pyRfjOvfvNSI8dSL2uNQsbUBtJ7+0 JV3ls2IjJK62lF8LPY7O9wb6FQmHVYXNfr1fHi6XYtEXjaZp8Tk8F8DOMFroRMepyKwZzx+Na IJw88VlmGN9hnCn1FFV6iVbsC1yosIgcmOFiV35/FYbEhkgq3TkgzIgRejSaAZbAz1pSK90zb svHBxS5FU8ZWy+6gCz4VEwqtxtiKXcr6oKlv7G3HVQspKmngl73R0doIQ37lYHqsfv+NnuI49 7zANnaxMpG1zWLNal3yRKwxkX4BXm/Jo3uo+/O4V0ox2K7dy0OAj/26RGSKWw4rIJ9f4PINHL n6IQY0aZ/Okc9uGvp45/Tm/3WCxVEku38CPJVtxAy/+TNi4jkIWUBz2ksjtw71I8SexI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188182 Archived-At: > I can't reproduce your problem on Fedora 21, configured with gcc 5.1.0 > -m32 and --without-imagemagick (ImageMagick breaks the build on my > native x86-64 platform due to library incompatibilities) and running > emacs -Q. When I tried profiler-start with mem, then letting tooltips > show over the modeline, then running profiler-report, I got the > following, which seems benign. What can one conclude from this: > profiler-memory-profile 943,516 95% That Emacs spent 95% of its allocations in `profiler-memory-profile'? So all overhead went to the profiler itself? This output makes even less sense than mine :-( martin