From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make-pointer-invisible on Windows Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:21:45 +0200 Message-ID: <55953AE9.4060204@gmx.at> References: <558A75C6.7040003@gmx.at> <83zj3pdusu.fsf@gnu.org> <558AEB8D.4070603@gmx.at> <83k2usewtv.fsf@gnu.org> <558BA156.6090508@gmx.at> <83a8vnesqm.fsf@gnu.org> <558CF75E.90801@gmx.at> <83wpyqdflh.fsf@gnu.org> <558D181A.4070402@gmx.at> <83twtudd0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpyn6g47.fsf@gnu.org> <559113CD.2070803@gmx.at> <838ub260d5.fsf@gnu.org> <55917D50.9030701@gmx.at> <83fv5a4dlr.fsf@gnu.org> <559230D1.7050701@gmx.at> <834mlp44id.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1435843344 23736 80.91.229.3 (2 Jul 2015 13:22:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 02 15:22:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAeRO-0005XD-W0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:22:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36556 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAeRO-0005sd-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAeRB-0005sV-Vg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:21:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAeR6-0006zk-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:21:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:50610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAeR6-0006zR-Ma; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:21:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.190.20.61] ([178.190.20.61]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lskr7-1Z3wLG0OhV-012JZo; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:21:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <834mlp44id.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:J/rKbQGahqDyH4A25vQuocMqPWROOyvmA/NgSiURfwLycGmyQQK vec4b5mz60QKWirfiGUkG69daOwAEFH2Fm0u7eeQxx2Y0wCxwHh4HSVljhbxm7Xu526n1tL i/Zpm9mzfLYp7MyT3YoI1YoOYA6RFKnEMT9hZ8OcaTZLZvEAxHGqCm9keoPqboFn/AsjhEx O6mug09zF+FESntTZ1QdQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:d96ea2090Wo=:oOdsPwNvaYkDqvBQJ9xdEb KlcUlaSasKERDdmkn3hJ1EPSiuuhXxRweDQ97cve9cSz7Xvv3pF0z1GaHz3KKszUWei9OS/M5 g+Z+YKP2lyxdK2bUnnFxQXlz4ya2CW40LI5ZJQsk90FC23hQiAbyHVxFL/Z20koEAy0nR56dT 9yhFeYk5OEQ9qwMZ4Kyso11DMCAvuOn3uBgOgHE05ObvwYEJeVcw6q/Mml7FWKo3x9Btq2Mub pLybtaCp040xQmYmYGyxskD2Y2DMnntKmjV73iwagWg0t8YdoHbP20H+7Cjz6zekApqw7TWvH bjAUGAVJJXtyeaM2lcxO0gVaIPF5BIaZhWbuC6q620mBd0hGVAbRBOODYkEc/SMSj/1lNJc4i DN7WLaSGZIQpyw5V33SDS1GPLsngI7QC/vsu3u5uogwMroEQCr7UmnxVW5TkHRstyWy/m0ETp JwNZGFq1MehqLK5r8prd5eDpJ8j8PaVMrawQUNN3kjUxI7UA1U95fb+dvT64ulrEoSC6+er+t SQ8FwvRqu0mRUE4c8sHA9sZ2UWmD6UKG+Mu0zqPAmBTw8aVUJ4xnxFq+JoSep+/puJK5qkVOM 8N9I2XzuZlIrydHb0oWvs74dHEsNKQG4uJkB1vX5AsAxtDqPZv60sfpvtSe6K/wWDuaDNA08s yiAUW5U7iEodrKngMomn6jL15SD81NrooQJRiFLyuAchopmRFEb188xINJrnT75rnvWo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187710 Archived-At: > We've been through this: it's not silly, but implementing that will > have to be able to compact several such redraw pairs into one, because > by the time the main thread wakes up, we could have received several > different expose events, and handling them one by one will cause > flickering. This sounds like too much work for such a minor improvement. > And after all that, we are still left with the use case of resizing > the frame. Indeed. Thanks for the patience, martin