From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug in save-some-buffers or diff.el?
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:52:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5567-Wed22Oct2003195204+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F96B187.2060507@yahoo.com> (message from Kevin Rodgers on Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:34:15 -0600)
> From: Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:34:15 -0600
>
> > Instead, `load' should load the newest of .el
> > or .elc files, and report the same warning as a simple reminder to
> > recompile updated .el files to execute them faster.
>
> That may be true for developers running CVS Emacs. But for normal
> users, it is the historic and expected behavior. For instance, it
> allows me to develop and test my own .el files while still having a
> working .elc file for both myself and others to use.
Indeed.
I fully agree with Kevin: the current behavior of `load' should not be
changed.
I do work on developing CVS Emacs, but still I find the current
behavior much more useful than the suggested one. For example, it
allows me to do a "cvs up" on selected files without worrying about
possible inconsistencies that might introduce (because some changes in
*.el files require related changes in other files in order for them to
work correctly).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-22 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-22 0:07 bug in save-some-buffers or diff.el? David Abrahams
2003-10-22 8:38 ` Juri Linkov
2003-10-22 9:35 ` David Abrahams
2003-10-22 12:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-10-22 15:22 ` David Abrahams
2003-10-22 14:35 ` Juri Linkov
2003-10-22 16:28 ` David Abrahams
2003-10-22 16:34 ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-10-22 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2003-10-23 4:53 ` Juri Linkov
2003-10-23 6:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-10-23 8:00 ` Juri Linkov
2003-10-24 14:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-10-23 18:38 ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-23 19:47 ` David Abrahams
2003-10-24 10:41 ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-27 17:44 ` emacshear (was: bug in save-some-buffers or diff.el?) Juri Linkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5567-Wed22Oct2003195204+0200-eliz@elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).