From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master efa6f10: .gitignore tweaks Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 21:09:00 +0300 Message-ID: <556213BC.2000801@yandex.ru> References: <20150524150825.25739.79722@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <5561E9F6.3010401@yandex.ru> <55620AC8.9030404@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432490980 763 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2015 18:09:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 18:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ivan Shmakov To: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 24 20:09:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YwaL8-0002h7-4K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 20:09:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40601 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwaL7-0001Bm-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 14:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwaKv-0001BX-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 14:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwaKq-0003kU-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 14:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:35413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwaKq-0003jq-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 14:09:16 -0400 Original-Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so29982853wic.0 for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 11:09:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FaxHBiPqOSrGGCBbxGiCgp1J/yggB0EQApiReWegWr8=; b=tfuLeh4HhwK3X0AP7Z83/VP01BNvMLAygvxnhR8qa1hhn0ReRxfUEVzDb3EFiejQos LMZI2ZB+2YPWPVaqbTGeIQKi7cMr4RBud1GEA04QOdRfcscEc6HJoLUJmCwk7CG0le8d cvaBdgh0f4q5yHugPe3wVWybhoW783CfWrqqIA+3SZYMBht7BtMivDTcpwAPZhi/cnbc OukSXcjgygKmHvk+VcPnF9KZmwAZ1FQuXfCa7WOnqcrWKa8ZzCMCpd5crEZKVysuUyW5 eUN0I2n+7YWKuKfuGFD/Rk4D7wNzA+rRbHcxBkQpSVbA9bXEBQFn03qTRCFn0Op1Eo8k L9Sw== X-Received: by 10.194.209.168 with SMTP id mn8mr31499619wjc.49.1432490946284; Sun, 24 May 2015 11:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vz2sm10257011wjc.20.2015.05.24.11.09.05 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 May 2015 11:09:06 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 In-Reply-To: <55620AC8.9030404@cs.ucla.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186783 Archived-At: On 05/24/2015 08:30 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > Using .txt for attached patches works around a Thunderbird bug noted > by Ivan Shmakov on this list. Interesting. I've missed that email entirely. > Here, the contents are a base64 representation of exactly the same file > as before, but Thunderbird has labeled the attachment as UTF-8. This is > more likely to work in practice. Thanks, I see it, and it's the same in email sent from Thunderbird 38 (beta). The intricacies of how it should work are above me, but isn't this bug report-worthy? And sending patch with a "wrong" extension means that after it's saved, the other party will have more trouble viewing it correctly. gedit does no appropriate syntax highlighting for .txt, and Emacs opens them in text-mode by default (which means no syntax highlighting, or chunk navigation commands). This cure might be worse than the disease.