From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: UI inconveniences with M-. Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 20:44:04 +0300 Message-ID: <55450CE4.4080104@yandex.ru> References: <83zja6b3tc.fsf@gnu.org> <54A24079.4020902@yandex.ru> <54A2FF47.6010207@yandex.ru> <54A86135.7080004@yandex.ru> <54A90002.7080009@gmx.at> <54A9C3FB.7000602@yandex.ru> <54AA3881.3080304@gmx.at> <54ABBB47.7010603@yandex.ru> <837fszx7iy.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3r5wqwv.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2wxwexb.fsf@gnu.org> <83fv7kwbow.fsf@gnu.org> <837fsvuefq.fsf@gnu.org> <837fstu3zh.fsf@gnu.org> <5543EC00.8010707@yandex.ru> <83zj5npfcp.fsf@gnu.org> <5544C5F2.4090905@yandex.ru> <83fv7fp260.fsf@gnu.org> <5544D1A1.7080604@yandex.ru> <83d22jozzg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430588705 27756 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2015 17:45:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 17:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 19:45:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YobTE-0004JK-Aw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 19:44:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YobTD-0004Td-OO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 13:44:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YobSp-00049I-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 13:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YobSk-0006Ow-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2015 13:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:32959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YobSk-0006HQ-2h; Sat, 02 May 2015 13:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: by wief7 with SMTP id f7so50067578wie.0; Sat, 02 May 2015 10:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8WyoQ9Rfb3+OTJxELa4arFiptXnrd/mtDZBEalGU8ZY=; b=kE+kuR2ID1pV2wWrlNVXpdYpeAm/WKtXxeWN6fPAN/K/X9Lij0ha7PDH7NMYIw8jJQ WRJ0iXt10fU7lotQ3InqmUIiayWw9iiNTbDCDY47VJFYHC1xKFpai0yQY+DfTedfF9Dr ZzyBFOTbLQbrGtb0xmsB74zWDMMEa0yMrwGhmETJCJmcnK6ISGI4P+0k1rrHW9FNmSmd aot+YRhDe87KJYpFlXF6MmU+i8npl5oKAKuh3d8qScI/BwAtFxSYAtEUTwYtZboOtCeB 90fUX2qkXqMiIYrHbwY8t0qmnNzu84tO6sZuIK+Vm9UyG2VHcMeZSZD/5zEXasIuFQIp Re0w== X-Received: by 10.194.185.9 with SMTP id ey9mr28124434wjc.70.1430588647466; Sat, 02 May 2015 10:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k9sm3237326wia.6.2015.05.02.10.44.06 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 May 2015 10:44:07 -0700 (PDT) user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 in-reply-to: <83d22jozzg.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186146 Archived-At: On 05/02/2015 04:44 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Yes, but I didn't demand that. There's no demand, I'd say. But the discussion has stopped making real progress without it. The aforementioned bug is also at standstill, you might notice.