From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 4e23cd0 4/5: * mail/rmail.el (rmail-show-message-1): When displaying a mime message, Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:12:57 +0300 Message-ID: <5526A509.9050603@yandex.ru> References: <83mw2mn2no.fsf@gnu.org> <5521359D.2000509@yandex.ru> <83fv8emvgq.fsf@gnu.org> <55219139.8040507@yandex.ru> <83oan2l4pk.fsf@gnu.org> <5521B811.8070603@yandex.ru> <83d23hlmia.fsf@gnu.org> <20150407165131.GA2600@acm.fritz.box> <552486A4.2020803@yandex.ru> <20150408104847.GA4252@acm.fritz.box> <5525D2ED.7030703@yandex.ru> <83iod5g3rr.fsf@gnu.org> <55266E77.3080109@yandex.ru> <836195forr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428595997 9604 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2015 16:13:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 09 18:13:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YgF4p-0004wy-5U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:13:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35543 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgF4o-0000JV-Fp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgF4j-0000GV-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgF4f-0008Vx-C8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]:33224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YgF4f-0008Vr-3A; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 12:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: by wgin8 with SMTP id n8so125428385wgi.0; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:13:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mdC6CnPifVaHq4qeWG9ZJDKCrMcSMdoElDUcOtIU7l0=; b=ysv8cnuTogGGSeokuNZzMyl/Rlde5PN9YV8l0/s8Y/edg5SZ2ha/SK2FbaXEUlYuhG D6DtBAI+WoMLfwQ8AbWjyK7ZOsik0dqWaR+rovYz2YZa4Ue4tUvd5e+JDzBtGhOXvxQy mchZOKYKocHrmu8JRTCcJy3iKMX/8xy6yOQZRlWfmPVxQY/zHPGVZ9QFwYh6I5sz3Hna eIY+CqO+9gLB1bUOR//YM4XQtA83j05NDDmENEnWqoKeavLW4O70GD327UbwxBmf7fk2 sw9U8Lg/GmW9zOl7059vNs9ZrMngQDQ8Uic8gdghbb/52tEysBaxXPrt5WUVNeRSFvha 35DQ== X-Received: by 10.194.5.103 with SMTP id r7mr60081237wjr.47.1428595980190; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id df1sm3038150wib.12.2015.04.09.09.12.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:12:59 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0 In-Reply-To: <836195forr.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185214 Archived-At: On 04/09/2015 03:51 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't know about orders of magnitude, and we didn't try Mercurial. > We did use Bazaar, and Richard never complained like that, AFAIR. Someone motivated enough should be able to write something analogous to bound branches, in an alternative commit command. > You forget that there are those among us for whom all of those things > were lessons learned long ago. Which leaves just Git as the step to > climb. I don't, just offering an alternative viewpoint. Arguably, a more common one. And if it's not more common now, wait a few years.