From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: DWIM for killing *shell* and a more process-query-on-exit Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:22:41 +0200 Message-ID: <5517FCA1.7050404@online.de> References: <55179479.2030109@dancol.org> <5517B20E.5020804@online.de> <5517B68D.20303@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427635405 16671 80.91.229.3 (29 Mar 2015 13:23:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab To: Daniel Colascione , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 29 15:23:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YcDBM-0001bt-IW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:23:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57123 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcDBM-0000zu-0f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:23:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcDB8-0000ze-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcDB5-0004qH-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:52326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YcDB5-0004qC-5X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([77.6.188.69]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MG2ic-1YeuKP1J82-00Es0c; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:22:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <5517B68D.20303@dancol.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:FPd3P/Z3P2Lcqr2QIj5kpfJlsBZm8oB5+NKrTFB43bMJCtDuT8X 6K/VnGw+YOihvrwR62Ik+C0RMWcmuHDWDJKlmqEOLflTw8H8wUAlfjK3d4OskxOn2pKHNB8 VosnGrXf2lu+O8XZ44wEGZ6+aSid1hpIFRzFQM+New/G14QRIo2bO4AL6iRRFF8rDtIwPN5 YiVlLX4034JfJir283DHA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.130 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184513 Archived-At: Am 29.03.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Daniel Colascione: > On 03/29/2015 01:04 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> as changing C-source might turn costly, what about that: > Why? > Because hardly anyone might know about all the Emacs Lisp code built upon. AFAIU replacing a flag by a function might breaks things. Well, maybe it's worth it? IMHO not, if it's possible to implement it in Elisp, called by circumstances instead.