From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:29:46 -0700 Message-ID: <5511BB2A.2070909@dancol.org> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <83pp7yp5po.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EP0CDfgPcjxKWmiSxOBF7bQEOeQkpXBlS" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427225410 3251 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2015 19:30:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Sebastien Vauban Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 24 20:30:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUWW-0004gz-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:30:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUWV-0005uf-Qo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUWR-0005uW-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUWQ-00071f-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:29:55 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:53402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUWQ-0006zt-Gc; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:29:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=WsucZITcAo/wWe/fzH7i9ckKeEtKb9SVc4HiiokCGUo=; b=J8d/9YRQyBj3maevPNzm2BDv0fSeGPtDn9EBGlEU8zSzkKcHme5xBb/6NF+RoiFQT1ATY8HqB8Kb5WStbeQ+QWLWg4XAepQhUKL37R5pUcEe5CEnzIxojCzjmIZS5edfJv9Z8CqQupeWx4in+9nnXXYfOLuW5sAUmmYlHe1QPODMR9Dun+93E1ss+VUiEKC8jTAo+aD8RkrMeRJm7ENlfD0ByyDpMw/8nZqI6kdDlSHBCaxUUBbg6SO8xM5xaBu+D+xL8RPP4ODl9/Jsul3D/4n7wPaIZw8yyr/qJ9qHTWDw9T7wJeAkx+oPkLk7v69/qbtmhF0h9sO/P5OHv12G7A==; Original-Received: from [2620:10d:c083:1004:56ee:75ff:fe20:83dc] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YaUWP-00036m-37; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:29:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: <83pp7yp5po.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184176 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --EP0CDfgPcjxKWmiSxOBF7bQEOeQkpXBlS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/24/2015 12:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Sebastien Vauban >> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:05:33 +0100 >> >> I think that the real conclusion of the discussion is: shouldn't vc-di= r >> have a command to push? And, to that, I guess most of us would answer= >> yes, right? >=20 > A related question is: does "C-x v v" at all make sense with Git and > other dVCSes? If it does, what would be the DWIM cycle there? E.g., > would it make sense for "C-x v v" to push when the previous action was > commit and there are not uncommitted changes? C-x v v should never push. That would be too surprising to user used to working locally. --EP0CDfgPcjxKWmiSxOBF7bQEOeQkpXBlS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVEbsrAAoJEN4WImmbpWBl9IMP/i6KrYkqrpwOb3CA8SF3lrXe NpWfNO8dLc8MIpiQaMsfvQVxUWr8PrVAg+zMZFju+VVQVw4ioZ37d8XDhy/C9F8k Sqzflub514CFfLoOzATuPsdY8XuVtUx7mPGIvJwbEdhgQbZO6zhK3Oxil3C37Uut fu4mRfM2Zh9eFW8QZpVUzkmzO71z3YKvJC2k2FiSPS3V6Qi56pLK29Zur8rwpwWO Env/+IhUy3smZJQzm2oOTBJBeyNyqFdgPRvU+qovqDXhQ7YqNJk8jV8g1MB8F3WV A1XK+OePdzSg5h6RbXM0lwKB1DfZBNFgOhsGvOMa7dl62KA/4hM1ceZYyrp6AnrE 3cRjVMES11L3y5ZQHToqV/YfIKKaQAMAKOB3ppayNVu5PMG1eIZYI4wwBre6qH8+ YB4tNhTO8BLMqvCsniGav5G1gfO7zx1v+8gfiQDlSiMh5+bXx3t4rS1II52j5PsA sC8+32coCQh0mdB7GmZMc02nbaDWxj7cvg/W/oHhw99XM9amcDgfoK82NA2PISfL n4XU4TKjG1xg3mhAwHw5lhX9TzBsRpbJ27c/Cm9El36uHgHJXD2ToL5YJjdsGurL lMrj2lBbe/ePOGk4Vvr+0EtyCwoBrZfgPiBO5YEY9DXvijFMnHl8ab/MTzKN4tDF E7cOc2kXYK91brrHkUJ+ =7Vei -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EP0CDfgPcjxKWmiSxOBF7bQEOeQkpXBlS--