From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:27:10 +0100 Message-ID: <5508800E.3070600@gmx.at> References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> <838uex1u1m.fsf@gnu.org> <8361a029p2.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbi0zukw.fsf@gnu.org> <55080104.9070606@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426620465 27715 80.91.229.3 (17 Mar 2015 19:27:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 17 20:27:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXx9L-0000hN-UW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:27:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56696 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXx9L-0003oV-De for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34425) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXx9I-0003oF-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXx9H-0000Uv-JZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:53889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXx9D-0000UF-1K; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [88.117.63.168] ([88.117.63.168]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6Ana-1ZRSXY3cUM-00y9W7; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:27:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5/Xz0HrwzvmticOcHr5tv3TczZZR0euwfp/VvJGVeOel07febeO W9CH1sgcm0Wi3oLxsR7LJWz0GE7XyDSdj43+c8X+6faIvWB9rfPoAgUnD34m6GHmmHYFTLG ENyFWgFBq2b/WxdBaM9LT5+hfUDXTqBU7acMDIqgHiz4jlt1IHVVd/qWiwRZ/dd9FPFZ2Cd 9B3xntIxD63/kZH0UkL2g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183967 Archived-At: >> Couldn't pre-redisplay-hook move `point' off the window? > > Yes. Or it could delete the buffer and all my files. Hmm... moving `point' off the window could be a side-effect of fontifying. >> Then redisplay would have to move `point' back to the window. > > Indeed. And would run pre-redisplay-hook again. martin