From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C and Emacs Lisp code parts Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:25:22 +0200 Message-ID: <54f5d80c-f20b-31aa-b438-401984fcb5b8@online.de> References: <624c3d37-c829-7187-a699-7d7bbc211a20@online.de> <83ziq1u668.fsf@gnu.org> <83y45lu2up.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467375701 7732 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2016 12:21:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 12:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 14:21:32 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bIxRk-0002zX-OH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:21:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIxRj-0004ry-QI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:21:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIxRA-0004qM-HT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:20:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIxR4-0003HX-Hg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:20:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:50399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIxR4-0003HS-6d; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:20:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([95.119.235.231]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue005) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M21V9-1bcYx00F6R-00u08H; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:20:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: <83y45lu2up.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3ZkImWeNslkpta/ydU3U/NQhNkrHNvJuUalR5c1gjognn5SMh8C n5Htwhpybg1GNAu8Ka+w15zFRtVCeysGdLwn2Vs4nMouGD6PNQVojAH1WvpcGFmj/OhA2ay UcvQvFCACO01jhsN+yhCj2x+Vujb6uZ2OLSr5edZTJ7m/Nxma8eeHiUPhfW9QBZQF641lga NHsNljkYXzLfc+ZyBbS/g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:UaHV5kakgyw=:WgRtgVgz8qb4S6aXcQWpzb r4RomJ0+/QPkc/ftVrQksxAIleTpcAjUHp58u5CI4gMpsg0AnVYVmJMBjD1Yx2uUzj1f8Sgme 7GU9cZqRsNyaoB7R0/OrvGI4NaCTCzvwkOXiSN6bWj0rsCJN/DJGxdxcDgpuDRejmU9jeyZJX 3cx8G67AKl2X7Id49Ju5o+tVsXzagkSzT/Y3cW+zo3EC2h06WlKU3CBZgC0VsLqUpkWbZLXti uMkk1XP/8+CfBh2NwW6k3QV+wgPk5VE5QeopWxkYE2wSdTR/oFTHk7FtA0J1DfQHw3a2B6Gmy 4O5PNf1tWNhb08S4LvgFeHYZycsGeRjhYvplsh9yn8/VSnzFcEQS6NLRn+JNlDbAsmKWjic2v arJCaio7rGCG1AKwsQaIIinFyjHx6ylACI6iD2Pj1SK1ZCxyhLGnwoJelvUN7kb8QwHAv8Bc9 Rg8+88XFClBKbw4D67EQG87sSpIBHvbL77DDBL9SeWyYkVbXKmFqUCRwfH+pq7epqA331fHOe Pqzc5fgEIcN81uTAOemm5xXDhSC7OM5TAswnwrsT8CRIBSzP3wtklhF8een8S3Znu1tuRhcaX Qiq9cV7Jeveh+JXwQZIDO6WYVI5OD8e+JVS+W19cacRjuvx+hhX0yTLIZm9ZEaPVpzjeYDXHS fzhIq4aF0tNZC1kW04nCcLar0PnG+Bn1PEcv1O4nvGDEwjpYrT8ox7Vr7NoawdlJW9iuPEiDE t5Nmr5VEqjvmJ/+J X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.135 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205032 Archived-At: On 01.07.2016 11:25, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > So yes, we need numbers to make rational decisions about this. Sorry, but that's irrational. Compare doesn't need numbers. To compare implementations in C an exec is needed - which doesn't exist yet. If written, the reason basically is gone, because C will be faster - unless something went wrong, which is a case for debugging rather than benchmarks.