unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org, gcl-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org
Subject: Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?
Date: 07 Oct 2004 11:44:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54acuyfs7j.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437506D2-178C-11D9-BCD2-000D93505B76@swipnet.se>

Greetings!

"Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> writes:

> >> I have checked in a test that runs a program and sees if the heap
> >> start
> >> address is random.
> >
> > Doesn't this harm cross-building Emacs?  I always thought that running
> > a test program at configure time should be avoided, and that tests
> > that only compile or link programs should be peferred.
> 
> When cross compiling the test obviously can not be run, so configure
> assumes
> that the heap start address is not random.  Come to think of it, the old
> test (checking /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield) was worse, as it did not
> handle
> cross compiling.
> 

GCL also checks for a randomized sbrk a configure time, and builds
into main a personality switch followed by a re-exec to work around
the fedora security issues.  I'm hoping this avenue won't be going
away soon, as I feel there are benefits to the current sbrk-expanding
contiguous heap design of these systems.

Don't know if there is any answer to the cross-compiling.

Take care,

> 	Jan D.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-devel mailing list
> Emacs-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire			     			camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-07 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-04  5:53 `exec shield' test in configure too strict? Miles Bader
2004-10-04 15:04 ` Jan D.
2004-10-04 21:20   ` Miles Bader
2004-10-04 21:37     ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 20:40     ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 21:44       ` Stefan Monnier
2004-10-05 22:11         ` Jan D.
2004-10-06  0:18           ` Stefan
2004-10-06  1:34             ` Miles Bader
2004-10-06  7:50               ` Jan D.
2004-10-06  7:56                 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-06 11:31                   ` Jan D.
2004-10-06  7:48             ` Jan D.
2004-10-06 12:58               ` Stefan Monnier
2004-10-06 11:16       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-06 11:38         ` Jan D.
2004-10-07 15:44           ` Camm Maguire [this message]
2004-10-07 16:44         ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-07 18:16           ` Jan D.
2004-10-09  1:25             ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-11 10:30               ` Jan D.
2004-10-12  8:56                 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-20 20:33                   ` Jan D.
2004-10-21 13:57                     ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-22 21:02                     ` Camm Maguire
2004-10-25 19:05                       ` Jan D.
2004-10-26 20:24                         ` Camm Maguire
2004-10-27 10:48                         ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-27 12:17                           ` Jan D.
2004-11-06 17:00                     ` other unexec problems Camm Maguire
2004-11-09  7:58                       ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 18:04 ` `exec shield' test in configure too strict? Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54acuyfs7j.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com \
    --to=camm@enhanced.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=gcl-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=miles@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).