From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Daiki Ueno" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:58:29 +0900 Message-ID: <54a15d860711071658j40e1af43r6be4fb0f44ece932@mail.gmail.com> References: <87zly3y4ru.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194483529 5360 80.91.229.12 (8 Nov 2007 00:58:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:58:49 +0000 (UTC) To: rms@gnu.org, ueno@unixuser.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 08 01:58:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpvjM-0006F1-N0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 01:58:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpvjB-0003Fy-Kg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipvj7-0003Bu-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:58:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipvj5-00038b-U0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:58:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ipvj5-00037v-Nn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.184] helo=rn-out-0102.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ipvj5-0005MF-2N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: by rn-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id e27so1238718rng for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:58:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=fMy6YCFMV6tgXFGz90LQ9MZiP3iUOInNHlyrKX0WTEc=; b=hYslQMs7fF27NQOv10U7ZRoe71e3gzm9Av5cGZOXhW/GQc8QPiDuGvNkKSEy+pLrcPJEtK3uZf9F3JEnZpb4dN3P9W6cx703w6igTqfEIVS7WZO2l+SqFimCQrjBLwGz5kx5mbIIlqMUpn/3zd0MF5t0mik76TnNWu0bB4thCtY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=tx30QldoSyMxUJbfkWEcmtlJytMn6iRTIcFOiaErFtV8hyQkeCdhSrhLVlfZdKUvi4rgX1eADBAG/dqLgKnLmCgvGYsqLulcoYgt47G2p5jHzVwXI2DGbERnylfutKTO7imhEEnbfLopDAewiDMXL5WKTQVu7IqknxLM9XInb0g= Original-Received: by 10.142.229.4 with SMTP id b4mr2450712wfh.1194483509536; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:58:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.241.4 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 16:58:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 531977cec7658a48 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82776 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65589 Archived-At: 2007/11/7, Ted Zlatanov : > RS> Evidence of users actually wanting to use that sort of extension in > RS> Emacs would convince me very quickly. > > So far Stefan Monnier, Reiner Steib, and I have said this is something > we want. Daiki Ueno is the only one to have spoken against it. > Excluding the package maintainers for each side, this is 2-0. Any more > votes for either side? They really use encrypt.el and are saying that they want to use such sort of extension? It seems not. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno