From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Daiki Ueno" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus in Emacs is updated to No Gnus 0.7 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:56:56 +0900 Message-ID: <54a15d860710281956u3d8ce51dr57a8b0145a59f205@mail.gmail.com> References: <87zly3y4ru.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87odejy30k.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193626637 26710 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2007 02:57:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Miles Bader" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 29 03:57:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ImKoV-0007n5-4D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:57:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImKoJ-0006p0-V5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImKoG-0006on-UM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImKoF-0006oS-HA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImKoF-0006oO-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.226]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImKoE-0004Fd-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so1021442nzc for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:56:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=LYbE6Kj2L4yjLFX/xTprRd3gX8A03JAviZmFhLEj3Sc=; b=csdI0eXPUFBDdpd522Xa+hugeeZJTohm7D3rOQlRmmP4eR2teQg07wN0oJEo+G3DWYsSgg4yEC5g77iivk+gk8cdr6mPyByDtpKOpfRnyhI3PcPV78Fn1qQN/91UJoOHnmdqscn4CJDr4gVYXl++fvBNdHfj8l3Ud9pD37dXnSU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=LF818iY0dXCBN5z2mFTn8dEqgpj9+/7+MZMyEPVXBriIB55tkJs2en40Zsiv2nmFRy6bWw2FQ8lxSA9LNxkpXedjXCJ+/2JSVAj65p8dz0U6FxDGITzP+ucrS/voDsnF+mexBnf1P7Tu1khoEHRDxrcGJcICy25HLP49NoLyD70= Original-Received: by 10.142.89.9 with SMTP id m9mr1182173wfb.1193626617000; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.142.203.17 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:56:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87odejy30k.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0c07bc27423c80b7 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82022 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65478 Archived-At: 2007/10/28, Miles Bader : > 2) It includes "password.el" (in lisp/gnus), which I seemed to > remember was not liked in previous emacs-devel discussion. However > that's a small enough file that I suppose it can be easily replaced > if necessary. I can't remember the previous discussion, but I think it's not so bad for *applications* (such as Gnus) to use password.el. I'd just say that it's bad if it is implicitly used by low-level *libraries* such as pgg.el. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno