From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-dir default directory: repository root? Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:46:28 +0200 Message-ID: <54C10D44.7020505@yandex.ru> References: <54B0CC33.2050100@dancol.org> <54BC60A8.6040401@yandex.ru> <54BD9071.5070802@yandex.ru> <85sif3zzwp.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <54C0013C.7070601@dancol.org> <54C0560F.7020609@yandex.ru> <54C107EB.3040408@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421938012 4996 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2015 14:46:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , Daniel Colascione , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 22 15:46:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ1u-0003Zv-O1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:46:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53665 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ1u-0004d3-6V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:46:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ1o-0004Y5-Cs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:46:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ1k-0001DX-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:46:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]:63771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ1k-0001DF-8V; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:46:32 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k11so2170109wes.6; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:46:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w/FwE+YTGs9kkQvZ/Pz9PFUi9p8v9HpH9iP/H7R4iVY=; b=bPfYlfljhgmwHCL3gxCZLPclukd2zbVZnj897+Advfhn/Ca119UnZF/R+BuMebJn6M C620UCBuRi4xPhHdY+O8yQnFEOD2oVBr+RPS77BI1FS5Chl0Y6SFnbTRhXlvn91Uwrvq jGuubQxGxFQH7KgxiZlcgAaZXDvFS9A6wLFA/iScVs7foILTdz3Q+a6NZSTZ+qfRfCRd TQT4EIjXOjcVI16ntjuuQNOxdlQHvBLUQsSurAAAEwyXOjz/21gaEIh1iROpFM+4GcF6 cxHc1RFzJ/6VYjJIoDZIhdOabYlj+IRPIGlKpD8aieapp+lXaQ9Mkw82QbdC+CWKY1yL /rmA== X-Received: by 10.194.94.227 with SMTP id df3mr4034418wjb.34.1421937991618; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:46:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([82.102.93.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p6sm4222246wjf.39.2015.01.22.06.46.30 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:46:31 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/33.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181608 Archived-At: On 01/22/2015 04:38 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Whatever you may think of this mode, it means that a lot of users are >> unfamiliar with that use of `M-n'. > > Everyone has used the history. Putting a value in history that the user has never put in themselves means overloading the term "history". I'm not that strongly opposed to this approach as long as root will be the default, but the C-u/C-uC-u approach looks a lot more appealing, and it'll save a keystroke. Also, C-u and M-n are more or less equally easy to press.