From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:57:16 -0800 Message-ID: <54C0C97C.9040707@dancol.org> References: <54C05269.7050602@dancol.org> <87oaprfa3t.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <54C0C514.8020606@dancol.org> <54C0C7E9.4050009@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uhNhSlxa6RJVaBT2m6LUJLuDv1o0Ex7Tc" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421920655 409 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2015 09:57:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgS3lsbGluZ3N0YWQ=?= , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Oleh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 22 10:57:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YEEW6-0006dd-Ki for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:57:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52075 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEEW1-0001h5-6t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 04:57:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEEVr-0001TR-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 04:57:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEEVq-00066G-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 04:57:19 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:60308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEEVq-000667-9c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 04:57:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=j/zRF1VuxIJ6xoJy00MbdDU2VKZ/JpC2y9FZn+XBZ2g=; b=BVDfFs1Aja2yjSWdwISuF4eiNp78Q7m/FfbiU+gZDsz6D1WkowsmpDabwVEz8huiw52p2xhUMsUZxVpw6Zc8GdQCK3vNhF4bnSxRfoQkacrSlROdVa6ncNRD/ugqRyw4XscjAtQczlh2E8MxTpMjt07wEKE5WBql6hiyFFwmuZJf60CReBnFEH+0VLapTRmRfzgYxJCPJrkFn7I8vK/hsp/UtTnqKrAIbDutUfnaIzXN7I47CGIA1iONNp4VN6bnL5tzZeUcgMCoAgVm4JI0FcLk1maqoPfrLOz4nXDBnOTRabivUJa8/VB4VUj4VVQAUx4vSjrgZqDy/8XFv8mUDA==; Original-Received: from [2601:8:b240:93::2b1] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YEEVp-00007R-En; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:57:17 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181574 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --uhNhSlxa6RJVaBT2m6LUJLuDv1o0Ex7Tc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/22/2015 01:52 AM, Oleh wrote: >> Speaking of things that ship with Emacs: have you tried >> prettify-symbols-mode? >> >=20 > No need, I've had it for years with the approach that I describe here: > http://oremacs.com/2015/01/11/pretty-elisp-regex/ Sure. My point is that existence of prettify-symbols-mode and equivalent is another argument against the creation of a shorter-than-lambda function literal syntax. (By the way: the idea of a mode that hides backslashes in string literals scares me. I'd much rather just use rx.) --uhNhSlxa6RJVaBT2m6LUJLuDv1o0Ex7Tc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUwMl8AAoJEN4WImmbpWBl4PQP/jDC7PYUICNB0xYpfSE+Tu5o 4KH+CgeknJxfy5OvTUmPj6EuqagZALkV6Lu2fjLIZ8Vuj1lZraSl/mKCFR4NHqUG Ie0ExrK6PElKYOBMDYl49ncmFsYHDX2njtMH9Ts7Vx+OMu4Wh2Wb7KBw1pohKeyn nBlQmXPRykxEhX1fwdan+vkE1JqgOLb7k5wt3obOAR/w7pBCUUbR6Z0cutd5bgJj LH7aOk6CXifnCXKwHfzIqNwfz62dquTThkHueWhKZA92Q2bWlOvW/at/7Ww9O/92 nnrME97kZ+sskK4WSoT2VCnvm/rjXUNtUlvnHfOGBjOMaidaoLUmD+JW1WV8QryN HZBSGX11V4sg7URGhwabPxBFabLZRYG5pLSYs/iArlv3HXfrUyDhHDMBMkmPt381 1/IkcgjaqakW/jYCx11PPcqF4oQ8f7zY37oa19F0hjPeDSq/QNk3Szrhh/WAXZt/ FeLHQAxZCbT3Zsjsr3+jDZ/DR8B0gDkVrERDExbcLL/Now1WfcED9vZJgjTYPCpe c0l0fg97z7uwyVxH2sQeP60vh3NzCfbN0iz27B1/R7jJqRKZ0+mvxkyLuchZJuOn V3P0R38XMbqiCsVDRJKp5F1Upi5f5xPgPqrKETcBBbAsDh+UEfbHJ+m/xFb8nB5a UEdxQDYoPYU2AA4ut16O =kyeK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uhNhSlxa6RJVaBT2m6LUJLuDv1o0Ex7Tc--