From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-dir default directory: repository root? Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:57:57 -0800 Message-ID: <54BD1B75.4070608@dancol.org> References: <54B0CC33.2050100@dancol.org> <54BC6031.6010304@yandex.ru> <54BC8DF3.9080401@yandex.ru> <54BD1ACB.10100@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="31BLvKVQ5cX3bhrj98eliCbSvFMxwa1rQ" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421679563 3533 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2015 14:59:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 14:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 19 15:59:21 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YDDnU-0001lI-Lx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:59:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37897 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDDnU-0005qB-2x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:59:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDDmP-0003or-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:58:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDDmO-00073w-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:58:13 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:42197) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDDmO-0006zH-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:58:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=wKIQmHnbJhPBzsyQsvmvJ8nYmXk4rkCI9ml8a5Bw80o=; b=Whi9hrGcLA8tuY7/1fjcFDn6RxtNDZcMsNkGm3bSzExa24aqizwapKeUpIY57SlCE9sdpLWwI4EZ+lAHwouQTuQXN9FnsHLq2X6AC7zSMxmHxQkETciMaIJr423W9l/FUkMroXBSkd+55jLqnBVdTwK5G2FB9aew7QGNpSlGmTHYzWxmMg5ejpjwrD+CWUs8AqFnwC3aUpOwdk5QtdA4Ho3G2sSNEZICMePV8aSsKNOr5WuLG+UamRvelqcIgSh2Ca++/4dOUT8Z2+fiXg5goYF+vZpOjPstiiYeYmldccpQZXB7qAMBDeVfYh0+KMgo2XRTqQclIhm8eTQmV67inQ==; Original-Received: from [2620:10d:c081:1101:2ab2:bdff:fe1c:db58] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YDDmG-0005st-JS; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:58:04 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: <54BD1ACB.10100@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181435 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --31BLvKVQ5cX3bhrj98eliCbSvFMxwa1rQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/19/2015 06:55 AM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 01/19/2015 04:16 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >=20 >> There always are. We don't have to (and can't) accommodate everyone >> (not even me). >=20 > Someone should feel free to go ahead with that patch Okay. > but here's another > possible avenue for improvement: don't ask for the directory when > there's an existing vc-dir buffer, and it's for a parent of/or the > current directory. >=20 > Just display it, maybe not even refresh until the user asks. That will > cut some of the prompts overhead as well. The ergonomics of sometimes prompting and sometimes not strike me as potentially troublesome. Won't that lead to stray RETs in the vc-dir buff= er? --31BLvKVQ5cX3bhrj98eliCbSvFMxwa1rQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUvRt1AAoJEN4WImmbpWBlLH4P/ikzPkub0b/VneOGdQUgjloG 0YgOdWnqBzhcnoJGqueVqeyvfjsuowpLqxofsYXawIaRi+NhEVqPQvMs6sB1fDYQ cC3TwKmOc8rS2i0Ksj2K6uJf1wGJGrHKYY5zfowdB2af5w1L86cUdd5q1bssmdvj oBehsZLsZaxXiDEAXGINMKEVQSOuWHMqiCCW7j+yF3m8NMG06aSMPoC/c2pIk0I0 q6ZtS6JIx4fNr1yzw2rdRkCQE+uq57Rs2jgSWLiFe1IviFf3C4zIhxbhdZW2mvYa GrugN+A51/cich73M9dky/GA9gEyCu/5oEA6sWVRC7EgYneKkeVsC9cm66/Rbvfm dS+NhKvuRI33N1Q0JHzjBx9AYVeYL4+8sV0vQwFc/VkyhDxRV+RmcmZAkIHJXjre dy2VpuIZxAIHHSay6touIsoIZRDHWSSZhfbibQXCW+dgQYHNQrEB1Vc/d+RqlZBb oOG8UHYrYqvRRMdL76DUXiDyMvAMqbX3h9bgXwpQtXkX5005nZ2qwL5C5xWGzJnu /FLzmlouTKBcft7V/B4JEudnUa7eCMoOGYTdx9RsAwaNimQeXs/cKKyuAJpuWxov gI8o77l0PgJof9bvbZdTK63H/I3k/LqToWNJUhwFa+YQKLuNy4MkdWrYDxGNuUPu XDByOOzb1IkJm9w9YQQN =7r0H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --31BLvKVQ5cX3bhrj98eliCbSvFMxwa1rQ--