From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jorgen Schaefer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Generalizing find-definition Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:58:01 +0100 Message-ID: <54861EE9.8050201@forcix.cx> References: <20141102151524.0d9c665c@forcix> <20141117211039.37f03409@forcix> <877fymghgb.fsf@bredband.net> <85ppc0qf9a.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <85zjb3o09d.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <85tx1amnyg.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <85egsem1u2.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418075965 3479 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2014 21:59:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 08 22:59:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy6Kq-0002cy-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 22:59:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy6Kq-0002P1-3D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:59:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy6KV-0002Or-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy6KL-0006zw-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from loki.jorgenschaefer.de ([87.230.15.51]:50633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy6KL-0006yJ-OU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:58:45 -0500 Original-Received: by loki.jorgenschaefer.de (Postfix, from userid 998) id 9C38C200D3A; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:58:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.23] (port-3334.pppoe.wtnet.de [84.46.13.19]) by loki.jorgenschaefer.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A1CB200D2E; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:58:12 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 87.230.15.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179486 Archived-At: On 12/08/14 22:38, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> What happened to the other contenders? >> Nothing in particular. The competition is still open. > > Jorgen, what's your opinion? I was waiting for a decision by the project leader as to which of the proposed solutions is preferable before continuing to spend time on something that might not get used at all (question asked in <20141120212840.103e5758@forcix>). I do not particularly care either way. I wanted a solution to a problem, and whether I write the solution myself or someone else does it is fine with me, as long as the problem is solved. :-) Sadly, I will be mostly away from computers in the next weeks. If you decide for the function-based solution, I will not be able to work on it until after new year. Regards, Jorgen