From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grischka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Aborting display. Is this possible? Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:18:46 +0200 Message-ID: <544543F6.4080602@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413825572 11530 80.91.229.3 (20 Oct 2014 17:19:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: acm@muc.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 20 19:19:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XgGc8-000416-Ou for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:19:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46080 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgGc8-0003OJ-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:19:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgGbn-0003OC-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:19:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgGbg-0007Ew-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:51033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgGbg-0007El-4q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:18:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.43.14.179] ([89.15.238.179]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LvhC4-1YCITP32bM-017R3p; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:18:53 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) Original-References: 20141019141712.GB3197@acm.acm X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uIkNSiqsy7u4FjQS7y8CuHAsHWYSuq0bkM6Oy3YJIfZTNI/Q+0P h0HtbjOdqDiPUXoitxkxnpanhNoLyHQa+SN5qaipJNCGbjtpCV+Lw0TNGvTABI+SOARvMtJ 1hQWeyZeYD8/jEPVi4kWoShxIJNpEMn+dS919VyJWyunNLf1UJL9PHsssBLvzT6gAcc+Mti ZmTJHvvjTJWVQE+dvdGjw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175600 Archived-At: > Would it be possible to enhance display such that incoming input would > abort the current display operation? I've seen such working in 23.x. IIRC needs setting "redisplay-preemption-period" to some (very small?) value plus patching some bitrott in the related C. --- griachks