From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bidi reordering engine upgraded Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:42:12 +0200 Message-ID: <54410094.3020507@gmx.at> References: 8338an2jcd.fsf@gnu.org <5440F9BA.6030607@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413546180 2139 80.91.229.3 (17 Oct 2014 11:43:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:43:00 +0000 (UTC) To: grischka , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 17 13:42:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf5vo-00011U-5c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:42:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59427 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf5vn-000173-Mi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf5vU-00016x-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf5vL-0001hp-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xf5vL-0001hh-MR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:42:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.190.19.119] ([178.190.19.119]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MXllr-1XcCKY0KwR-00WjmJ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:42:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5440F9BA.6030607@gmx.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:C1iRns0ID/Z0qxsPBRkgCR+g6/LqlppQ0e9cRbtujEfxDkSDuw0 Ul0SdZIwb8lfM27IbJaME4JGvt2X4o12rlgOyGfuOa5Qb4iDSn2LqZhNCSI34M4ME7yM2Li wTeP+lyXMxtT331IetbT8jVaC4IU/yxAijp+tLdCrtO9qRDtDZ2MqS4q6yyaQ5uv0LvYEkt DvnU2xk/Q3YGSzyYqrahg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175515 Archived-At: > This is because to the human eye pixels are similar to points in math > (i.e.has location, does not have extent). Therefor, a mental "magnifying > glass" (in order to be useful) needs to preserve the point-like property > of pixels unaffected from the "zoom factor". > > Which means that what counts for line length is not number of pixels > but the spaces between. See line of length 10, magnified: > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 > * * * * * * * * * * * I doubt my eye (and whatever there's left behind it) would consider 0 * having zero extent. martin