From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage. Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:38:31 +0200 Message-ID: <5430270C-18D2-41FD-86E9-825AB8371F66@swipnet.se> References: <83oba22ymd.fsf@gnu.org> <6B4F86F0-164D-4CBE-8CD2-9BC9326451C4@swipnet.se> <8361w93k8e.fsf@gnu.org> <871u6x4we0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <58D8CF7D-C157-4D48-93B4-2EFFAA4AAF61@swipnet.se> <8338rd2q1h.fsf@gnu.org> <534E99D7-CC13-4C8D-A80B-EC00995F741A@swipnet.se> <83txjt15hw.fsf@gnu.org> <83li550z3l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374089932 13931 80.91.229.3 (17 Jul 2013 19:38:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 17 21:38:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UzXYi-0006D1-Ei for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:38:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49931 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzXYi-0007We-3L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:38:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzXYc-0007WJ-Ha for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:38:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzXYa-0001lj-Gb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:38:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout.melmac.se ([62.20.26.67]:50169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzXYa-0001lO-6O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:38:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.melmac.se (mail01.melmac.se [62.20.26.80]) by mailout.melmac.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240C19E97 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:38:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 27498 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jul 2013 19:38:30 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-57.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.57) by mail01.melmac.se with ESMTPA; 17 Jul 2013 19:38:30 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (unknown [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAE1E1A0596; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:38:30 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83li550z3l.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 62.20.26.67 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161985 Archived-At: Hello. 17 jul 2013 kl. 21:23 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >> From: Jan Dj=E4rv >> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:53:04 +0200 >> Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org developers" >>=20 >> What would those timers be for then? I can't find a single periodic = timer except blink timer that is on by default. >=20 > Like I said, I firmly believe that most Emacs users have many defaults > overridden by customizations. Two popular timers that come to my mind > are display-time and jit-stealth. To be sure we would have to make a poll. My experience differs from = yours. >=20 >> Also, why are you against reducing Emacs CPU-usage? >=20 > ??? Who said I'm against it? I just think that this particular change > will have almost no effect on Emacs CPU usage in any real-life > session. Duly noted. Jan D.