From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Antipov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp's future Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:45:54 +0400 Message-ID: <54257C22.2000806@yandex.ru> References: <54193A70.9020901@member.fsf.org> <87lhp6h4zb.fsf@panthera.terpri.org> <87k34qo4c1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411742831 31332 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2014 14:47:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 26 16:47:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XXWnX-0002Bz-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:47:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49522 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XXWnX-0007Xt-1k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XXWmz-0007Lj-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:46:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XXWmt-00040y-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:46:29 -0400 Original-Received: from forward3l.mail.yandex.net ([84.201.143.136]:49500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XXWme-0003yA-VI; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:46:09 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (smtp2h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.145]) by forward3l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7E1231501447; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:45:55 +0400 (MSK) Original-Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id EFCBE17058B6; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:45:54 +0400 (MSK) Original-Received: from unknown (unknown [37.139.80.10]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 9yWJ2fFnha-jsM8vuVu; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:45:54 +0400 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Uniq: 74c20543-977c-4327-b7f1-0e4ace591f7d DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1411742754; bh=qm6PUOzqSOOhzE6rqjEzUPTPEgzZ3gkuLtDbesGAMFI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CFaLnTaHd4aBlQRciCsmC1rm09TdFqWCtVzRQ0yfdlAe5+GnGE6bV3RUsjvHC0C+d 21ZEqx3OlNWtP89fy3YtniStchz09vbmxTBV75b5GJBQDfTmId/iF2GFbfZ+oXQWHi 4YDmJ+BPK2fv5acr9PBGujIG5QSDpkddsn6PlvQ4= Authentication-Results: smtp2h.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 In-Reply-To: <87k34qo4c1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 84.201.143.136 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174722 Archived-At: On 09/26/2014 06:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > So instead of interfacing one to the other, I think GUILE has more to > win than to lose by adopting some of the Emacs concepts and data models > regarding text/string processing rather than designing its own. Adopting Emacs? Why not just use ICU? This project's page claims about "GPL-compatible" free license (http://userguide.icu-project.org/icufaq). Dmitry