From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using Org as the source format to generate org.texi Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 19:00:18 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <5423df6f-5fc2-9d06-7366-a9bec9bc71d4@cs.ucla.edu> References: <878tb5axms.fsf@bzg.fr> <6630c346-1b5a-d265-2b3a-05c4f7c497c6@cs.ucla.edu> <87muzk4tzs.fsf@gnu.org> <0ma7vjsrzi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fu59qhbd.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87vae3zobm.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520737177 32657 195.159.176.226 (11 Mar 2018 02:59:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 02:59:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Phillip Lord , Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 11 03:59:33 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eurCr-0008Li-DZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 03:59:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52745 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eurEu-00032C-Eb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 22:01:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eurDn-0002zb-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 22:00:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eurDi-00019I-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 22:00:27 -0500 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:51020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eurDi-00017P-An for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 22:00:22 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4911616A0; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 19:00:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id yjPE6BjptGoo; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 19:00:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFAE1616B4; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 19:00:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id i1pnL-YIU0b0; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 19:00:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [47.154.30.119]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE2971616A0; Sat, 10 Mar 2018 19:00:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87vae3zobm.fsf@russet.org.uk> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223604 Archived-At: Phillip Lord wrote: > it would mean > that you could not build Emacs from a clean clone of the Emacs repo > without access to the ELPA repo (i.e. a local clone). I don't have a local clone of the ELPA repo, so this'd mean I couldn't do a clean build from Emacs source without going to some extra work. I think I'd feel more comfortable if we didn't impose this additional dependency on building Emacs. Can we arrange for that by moving the relevant code into Emacs proper? How much code are we talking about?