From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs i18n Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:05:03 +0100 Message-ID: <5417CC78-C70D-4AE2-869F-BA9FE1D40633@acm.org> References: <87o97aq6gz.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tvgoud56.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83o96wk2mi.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1hjfvjd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871s3p0zdz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h8ckezyt.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8cjspc0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <29a53a39-fa50-1e94-9420-a3ea1250aa44@gmail.com> <87r2azq478.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83o963s4gx.fsf@gnu.org> <87va09ckym.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83sgvdndt0.fsf@gnu.org> <8736ncgcnm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a7hir9xp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="75875"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, cpitclaudel@gmail.com, brandelune@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 25 23:10:46 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h8Xnp-000JRe-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:10:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49209 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8Xno-0001k0-E6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8Xng-0001fU-6F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8XiV-00066O-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail158c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.168]:47904 helo=mail51c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h8XiS-000645-7q; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 18:05:13 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1553551506; bh=6/6f+DJYKh8SrTUXJMhI5foHrXmH3ifG6ZBn9sBKbrM=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=HmSjFeLDZL8qWh6RhqI7RxsiipGFi+S2tZJ2fpH9ggtfT8MsbBjtcm7JW+lc1A6uT /uD1NX+7yeJ/6AxGze6OBZhPzyYfSd1g7WUUV9npJqDfcVVfHSI1dSUV+QGlStRVnv 5OTU002Sydls13cBgGMqY5EixYwVC5MNZIinZVvY= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.1.64] (c-e636e253.032-75-73746f71.bbcust.telenor.se [83.226.54.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail51c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id x2PM544s030374; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:05:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87a7hir9xp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020C.5C995092.0060, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=a8seC3aF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=M+GU/qJco4WXjv8D6jB2IA==:117 a=M+GU/qJco4WXjv8D6jB2IA==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ucMQw-l_AAAA:8 a=0UI1tS6szxcT0FtS1K8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=xkTruGkd22MpkFU079mG:22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 91.136.10.168 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234733 Archived-At: 25 mars 2019 kl. 22.11 skrev Juri Linkov : >=20 > Is it possible to generate a regexp from ngettext arguments? > For example, given the same arguments and calling a hypothetical > function =E2=80=98rx-ngettext=E2=80=99: >=20 > (rx-ngettext "finished with %d match found\n" > "finished with %d matches found\n") >=20 > to generate a regexp like: >=20 > "finished with \\(?:\\(\\(?:[0-9]+ \\)?match\\(?:es\\)? found\\)" Trivially so by generating an or-pattern: "singular text\\|plural text". = Anything better is a matter of optimisation, basically a diff algorithm = (or just prefix and suffix merging). Is it practical, though? For %s, we would need to generate a = match-anything subexpression, even though the argument is much more = constrained in practice.