From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes in frame/window code Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:32:17 +0200 Message-ID: <53F4BF81.30303@gmx.at> References: <53CE6A44.1010708@gmx.at> <53D76758.2030707@gmx.at> <831tt4h58x.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4vcfoqi.fsf@gnu.org> <53D77BDB.1090500@gmx.at> <83wqawflgj.fsf@gnu.org> <53D7A981.30909@gmx.at> <83lhrctdzr.fsf@gnu.org> <53D7C10C.4010402@gmx.at> <83k36wta5m.fsf@gnu.org> <53D7E6B0.7040504@gmx.at> <83egx4t3nq.fsf@gnu.org> <53D917B5.2050604@gmx.at> <837g2uu80w.fsf@gnu.org> <53D9211C.7010000@gmx.at> <834mxyu5jg.fsf@gnu.org> <53D92D04.3010006@gmx.at> <83zjfqspfw.fsf@gnu.org> <53DA0310.4010706@gmx.at> <53DA15C4.5050006@gmx.at> <83mwbpss6s.fsf@gnu.org> <53DA29EC.3000504@gmx.at> <837g2ssg30.fsf@gnu.org> <53DB6B08.7000305@gmx.at> <834mxws6a0.fsf@gnu.org> <53DBB268.2020909@gmx.at> <831tt0rwyp.fsf@gnu.org> <53EE2CD5.50603@gmx.a> <83tx5demej.fsf@gnu.org> <53EF25F2.9010909@gmx.at> <83iolsekqd.fsf@gnu.org> <53EF609C.2090303@gmx> <83wqa7cfoy.fsf@gnu.org> <53F1B9EA.6030808@gmx.at> <83lhqldeqf.fsf@gnu.org> <53F225A7.6030103@gmx.at> <83ha19day1.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnrgcxxt.fsf@gnu.org> <834mx7cj8t.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408548805 20407 80.91.229.3 (20 Aug 2014 15:33:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 20 17:33:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7st-000409-V5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:33:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56308 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7st-0003DB-JD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58673) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7sS-00031u-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:32:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7sK-0001Mj-Ii for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:54720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XK7s8-0001L3-VZ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.191.140.69] ([178.191.140.69]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDzGN-1X8mgR0TeR-00HM5U; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:32:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <834mx7cj8t.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vcS5zPnkz81BRYmZGwQ2aeAakVk7t+qUP1gA2KnX3ioU6aXR88p 4l5sBrcxuR/Q/lQUfmEjPRPrqx050nzGt3S6e/BcTqJ3Ln2wgld1fLbs1tsqp5WAlxehv3h EO803504xYX9uE1fuetK4Jy0XYqmru992tlnHsRh7m4AYn8LfLYkY6Uidz+gmBKkcNLiaze 8B70+s44dRA02v1CImrYQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173780 Archived-At: > I switched to using the GetScrollInfo information (for both horizontal > and vertical scroll bars) in trunk revision 117716. I didn't find any > reason for the current code, except, perhaps, the fact that an old > version of MSDN documentation didn't document SIF_TRACKPOS at all. > But since even the venerable "Programming Windows" by Petzold that was > published in 1998 described that value very well without any > qualifications for its support by various Windows versions we care > about, I think it's safe to use it. Looks good. Thanks for the change. martin