From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes in frame/window code Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:38:01 +0200 Message-ID: <53E097E9.1080708@gmx.at> References: <53CE6A44.1010708@gmx.at> <53D4FF76.1060804@gmx.at> <87fvhbpv9m.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407227931 22991 80.91.229.3 (5 Aug 2014 08:38:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 05 10:38:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XEaGZ-0002FM-0n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:38:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57754 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEaGY-0000xa-LI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 04:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEaG8-0000d9-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 04:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEaG0-0000it-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 04:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:49352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEaG0-0000ii-FS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 04:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [93.82.78.228] ([93.82.78.228]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LgZdt-1WcEd11p81-00nwbf; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:38:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fvhbpv9m.fsf@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4XftGHFaQ8Y74ub4GJmHZePRVeZq/eSH6rFlOqclfT0gRxW9MsY dA+SavQ0En0a81HevCgwJ0CYXJZSYOdaWWWWJkwRzHEji0uQuuGA1/lhi//zivJ31I0ujXs Jl9bw3LiTA78TJOKDTea/lodR/3jJTPQU3+2ApZl1Y7CAZDW8jlWBAlX1Maeesz7HJKp0+7 mdRPBVJgV1hTxQkPQKEGA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173430 Archived-At: > I don't use scroll bars, but I'll keep them on while they're being > tested. Thank you. > But is the dark bar above the mode line in the first picture > below a scroll bar? > >> (when (fboundp 'horizontal-scroll-bar-mode) >> (horizontal-scroll-bar-mode -1)) > > I ask, because applying this adds a small white space above the mode > line, as shown in the second picture. (Both are from emacs started with > emacs -Q.) This is a regression I introduced yesterday and only people who tested this interactively could notice it easily. Should be fixed now - please try again. Thanks a lot for spotting this, martin