From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes in frame/window code Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:44:34 +0200 Message-ID: <53D77B12.1000301@gmx.at> References: <53CE6A44.1010708@gmx.at> <53D4FF76.1060804@gmx.at> <8338dmj1of.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqayhe0o.fsf@gnu.org> <53D542B3.20206@gmx.at> <83tx62hane.fsf@gnu.org> <53D6172A.5010909@gmx.at> <83fvhlhad5.fsf@gnu.org> <53D656BB.3010201@gmx.at> <83egx5h86z.fsf@gnu.org> <53D68806.9080101@gmx.at> <838undgxiu.fsf@gnu.org> <53D76758.2030707@gmx.at> <831tt4h58x.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406630720 25689 80.91.229.3 (29 Jul 2014 10:45:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 29 12:45:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XC4u6-0001to-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:45:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC4u6-0006Nh-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC4tx-0006Iy-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC4tp-000876-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:55456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XC4th-00084d-9G; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:44:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [93.82.14.115] ([93.82.14.115]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfVYB-1WrMB81aeZ-00P2O4; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:44:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <831tt4h58x.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ARyoQvmfXw4ZqU0AlXum0zxFes8Lti/1qXUKmJnfFwIJH0d9TNt u6IVjQmCr+FN5R7ukFRks80zfQkVdRVz/3JVvqmswvQNnihwgLPn3pA58u1HpSn66bf3rZi aHDgVJBwIV9Wt1qim534fhEqxjWtC7qA2+HqDHjVe4Vsvq2/LeX7rgf/C/9728wbGYirQos VdLjJIhbNHY+QtheSbDWQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173243 Archived-At: > As long as we use logical-order columns, there really isn't any > alternative to this behavior. I doubt it can be improved. After all it seems to make better use of the available screen space. > Yes, because all the others (those I know of) are WYSIWYG word > processors, where the page size has a well-defined meaning and is > fixed within a given document. I do understand that now. > So if we can correctly compute the length of the longest line at all, > we can do it with any text, bidi or not. Therefore, the size of the > thumb will always be true (and is, I checked that, of course). Thanks. > I can only try this on MS-Windows. Thanks. I'll try to translate it to the other builds then. martin