From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes in frame/window code Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:27:01 +0200 Message-ID: <53D61765.6090705@gmx.at> References: <53CE6A44.1010708@gmx.at> <53D4FF76.1060804@gmx.at> <8338dmj1of.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqayhe0o.fsf@gnu.org> <53D542B3.20206@gmx.at> <53D5D618.4070302@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406539656 4888 80.91.229.3 (28 Jul 2014 09:27:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 28 11:27:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XBhDL-0006Hd-SL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:27:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBhDL-0006YI-GU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBhDA-0006Rr-G3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBhD1-0008Va-US for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:61209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBhD1-0008VV-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 05:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.96.36.5] ([194.96.36.5]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LjvV7-1Wf7PV2cOn-00bw7E; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:27:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <53D5D618.4070302@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:iYEYDnKjeJxpTpjk5gHKweS+5K7OSA1C7bqabzpwO97x1sCIhB+ VqpJ+/aNP4ee3OTW2aGKoKbbBmoj8MbCira4pAMKlvMk6Dw3rFfCJTuUsCsZAcHMILrbx+V HJPWGuZmwAjLiGEZjGp9g5ACWTOt18GvNlU5K+V30lIPcKVMctG7hiAYYkbS7NvArPDpIX9 uVcNYCBh1dDSDBakKSP1Q== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173204 Archived-At: > 1) What about different scroll bar colors on Lucid? If that matters, this is Xaw3d-1.6.2. Hmmm... how to reproduce that here? Basically, you are the first person on this list I would ask for a fix if I ever ran into such a problem. > 2) Did you ever run 'make check'? Well, I did so now for the first time. What does 'make check' do in principle? That is, what kind of build does it use? > I tried and got 55 core files with the same crash backtrace: > > #0 0x000000379220f62b in raise (sig=11) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pt-raise.c:37 > #1 0x00000000005738ba in terminate_due_to_signal (sig=11, backtrace_limit=40) at ../../trunk/src/emacs.c:387 > #2 0x000000000059da36 in handle_fatal_signal (sig=11) at ../../trunk/src/sysdep.c:1697 > #3 0x000000000059da0b in deliver_thread_signal (sig=11, handler=0x59da1c ) at ../../trunk/src/sysdep.c:1671 > #4 0x000000000059da6c in deliver_fatal_thread_signal (sig=11) at ../../trunk/src/sysdep.c:1709 > #5 > #6 0x0000000000428979 in adjust_frame_size (f=0xb9deb8, new_width=-1, new_height=-1, inhibit=1, pretend=false) > at ../../trunk/src/frame.c:490 > #7 0x00000000004c24ae in Fset_window_configuration (configuration=...) at ../../trunk/src/window.c:6371 > #8 0x000000000061d8f3 in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x7fff084ea648) at ../../trunk/src/eval.c:2808 > #9 0x0000000000667e33 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=..., vector=..., maxdepth=..., args_template=..., nargs=0, args=0x7fff084eae78) > at ../../trunk/src/bytecode.c:918 > > (Note -1 new_width and new_height at #6). These values are perfectly legitimate. Can this be related to the without-x issue? martin