From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not a regression, but shuld go into emacs-24 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:05:52 +0200 Message-ID: <538C2250.1090805@gmx.at> References: <538B03D4.6030502@swipnet.se> <538B1D0D.3010102@gmx.at> <538B6CC4.1060309@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401692791 9636 80.91.229.3 (2 Jun 2014 07:06:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 07:06:31 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 02 09:06:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WrMK0-0003HR-7d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:06:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43271 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrMJz-0001sO-M0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:06:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrMJp-0001mQ-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrMJh-0005ct-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:53278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrMJh-0005cp-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [178.191.141.162] ([178.191.141.162]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDi9C-1X1nmU18Xe-00H3Bd; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:05:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <538B6CC4.1060309@swipnet.se> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mEXR+QO2J0rF+Uv47dTXHzZ+ARpoV5GL+2c5afcAOkt2fshjmuu PsJOE+YDrjARugzgrhrjlZvkz6xhHEWgbZwTNJHjcrbk/G3A3JJktAX7RkYYgoVBe6KblcD NXANHGwULvUF1IyQdbBCWCLKl9omqsM5nBAG95JpkImzGsTeP08arLnKfs+izAlrcSS6TJC PCpNpUAYOUj07jQkVy43Q== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172250 Archived-At: > position is not needed, I removed it. It is called portion in > Motif/Lesstif (xm_scroll_callback) also, thats where it originates. > x_send_scroll_bar_event itself calls it portion. xaw_scroll_callback > calls it portion. Has not caused any confusion what I know of. Its a > tiny cosmetic thing. Jan D. I'm currently trying to set up horizontal scroll bars so please help me clarify this issue. The comment of x_set_toolkit_scroll_bar_thumb says /* Set the thumb size and position of scroll bar BAR. We are currently displaying PORTION out of a whole WHOLE, and our position POSITION. */ That of x_send_scroll_bar_event says /* Send a client message with message type Xatom_Scrollbar for a scroll action to the frame of WINDOW. PART is a value identifying the part of the scroll bar that was clicked on. PORTION is the amount to scroll of a whole of WHOLE. */ So the term PORTION in x_send_scroll_bar_event seems semantically equivalent to the term POSITION in x_set_toolkit_scroll_bar_thumb and not to the term PORTION in x_set_toolkit_scroll_bar_thumb. Is that interpretation correct? Thanks, martin