From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Davis Herring" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: warning about undo info being discarded when in *Backtrace* Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53491.128.165.123.18.1191956538.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> References: Reply-To: herring@lanl.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1191956605 12044 80.91.229.12 (9 Oct 2007 19:03:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 09 21:03:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IfKLl-0008I2-3n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 21:02:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfKLf-0007yS-Fb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfKLb-0007yN-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:02:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IfKLZ-0007yB-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:02:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IfKLZ-0007y8-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:02:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov ([204.121.3.2]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IfKLY-00085f-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay1.lanl.gov (mailrelay1.lanl.gov [128.165.4.101]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (8.13.8/8.13.8/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id l99J2LRG008749; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:02:22 -0600 Original-Received: from webmail1.lanl.gov (webmail1.lanl.gov [128.165.4.106]) by mailrelay1.lanl.gov (8.13.8/8.13.8/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id l99J2IV2021964; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:02:18 -0600 Original-Received: from webmail1.lanl.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by webmail1.lanl.gov (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l99J2IaA001295; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:02:18 -0600 Original-Received: (from apache@localhost) by webmail1.lanl.gov (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id l99J2IoX001292; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:02:18 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: webmail1.lanl.gov: apache set sender to herring@lanl.gov using -f Original-Received: from 128.165.123.18 (SquirrelMail authenticated user 196434) by webmail.lanl.gov with HTTP; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:02:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-6.el3.2lanl X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-CTN-5-MailScanner-Information: Please see http://network.lanl.gov/email/virus-scan.php X-CTN-5-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CTN-5-MailScanner-From: herring@lanl.gov X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80475 Archived-At: > 3. For this particular warning, does it make sense to repeat the warning > all? If undo was disabled in *Backtrace*, then it is still disabled, no? I > might be mistaken here, however: It's possible that each warning was > issued > after the *Backtrace* was entered anew. The warning would presumably be > issued only when undo was enabled and it became disabled. When the undo info is discarded, undo remains enabled in the affected buffer. Future large changes thus cause it to be discarded again. Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.