From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r116461: Connect electric-indent-mode up with CC Mode. Bug #15478. Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:38:44 +0200 Message-ID: <53306DA4.7060804@yandex.ru> References: <20140308225820.GB2726@acm.acm> <20140309123711.GA2615@acm.acm> <20140316223509.GD3854@acm.acm> <20140319224231.GB4783@acm.acm> <20140322131350.GA3163@acm.acm> <20140322231012.GB3562@acm.acm> <87wqfkgk02.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <871txsge04.fsf@yandex.ru> <83mwgf1pmh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395682752 26014 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 17:39:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, stephen@xemacs.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 18:39:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WS8qF-0004Sj-Lf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:39:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37744 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS8qF-0003Q8-48 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:39:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS8q3-0003Nj-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:39:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS8pu-0002On-Sz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bk0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4008:c01::22c]:53284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS8pm-0002Ju-0i; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:38:50 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id mz13so600820bkb.31 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:38:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HfDFrIjKU7l7R2JzUkYBmJ8+qlg0zKk0lerzRIzqRds=; b=xpRcHPn5PJs7hegB0O8ptzu8z6CkfyBZ3RauC72TI0szSK8SwZBts31XFa9hgsBcYb epW0O+jZBLEluoyO7m9N/kClXsqIZfWcA7249jjmC0c2Pa9EgwEKfYkRCoZtsBnU2BYT EnYvupwxMK+4i5MaMNg0wVuQUUE6gnszCwPnIYrUR5blulTSznUpfA54Fi5pCe9uCiw4 rybjY/xIAJi12FmKINqVm3kUdqz4ULrvqqozxLatwjYIVO54BIWwFHWixjS+Qsnc+3NN zzhb1mlgbv9rapfhPzVc5g9f7bfZ3De1LSfFOf4PwcHiJi89bCGOWOMNGJwQYbXX0az3 OYjw== X-Received: by 10.204.59.70 with SMTP id k6mr1128342bkh.52.1395682728277; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.94] (static-nbl2-118.cytanet.com.cy. [212.31.107.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id es17sm7948216bkb.7.2014.03.24.10.38.45 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:38:47 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <83mwgf1pmh.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4008:c01::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170920 Archived-At: On 24.03.2014 19:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > This might be mostly true, but not always. E.g., what if you delete a > character whose electricity caused the line to be indented in some > special way, when that character was inserted earlier? After deleting > that character, the line might no longer be indented correctly. This is covered by "through me typing TAB manually". If I delete a char or a keyword making the line indented incorrectly, the next thing I do is type TAB. And `reindent-' on RET would still be a no-op. This could be just me, but I somehow doubt that.