From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Increase default `line-spacing' to 0.05, 0.10 or 0.15 [proposal] Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 18:15:09 +0000 Message-ID: <531453ddd63a1d5b8402@heytings.org> References: <871ramlbpy.fsf@telefonica.net> <87fsz1zmhv.fsf@gmail.com> <87sg30usa2.fsf@gmail.com> <83mtt8dvft.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6p8w0b7.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7jgdqhs.fsf@gnu.org> <531453ddd626d93fbb46@heytings.org> <83czu3evks.fsf@gnu.org> <531453ddd6aad581d339@heytings.org> <831rajesgw.fsf@gnu.org> <531453ddd665244d7826@heytings.org> <83v97vdavm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="790"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, arstoffel@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 20:17:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leiZG-00005L-Vw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 20:17:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34704 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leiZG-000380-2I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leiX2-0001Qt-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:15:33 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:44426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leiWr-00084i-0G; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:15:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1620324910; bh=j/uUInfNtv7NrO8PXOI9QUGMSI4pm2gLwS+npmLEehM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=d0dx0UxZ33YFeIYx8qbTtRF4juMXPafvKZRbXHl5EvRf3RH/02YOWJ362bYkrQso+ EQobIM27jVPBonode8JhaiO9Zk6V36prMehwJ7kxtjovtaq2xsSL6Z8l4lM23xhLxo r+AQB3NY2ranM/EidIMzF3kmJAEngGI/pyKOYZ4OHQ33O3GM6F+So1r3DyGZ5P7X5S y694+jxjeZPvnDWJGzU6cW1oyYGNtAQ03XqjeAQo1/xP+Wf4ac4N+w+9h9A8DR0saS KOF0rI4bYneI780oloMN7TP4z/QjGrfdtrax8wqlE4xHiz0y0eZMvoXJ1nH2P1pOmb YFI0Kd/BdxJfQ== In-Reply-To: <83v97vdavm.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268987 Archived-At: >> Of course I trust you. Perhaps Emacs has a different understanding of >> what the ascent and descent of a glyph is? > > We use the font's ascent and descent values, > Unless that's a typo, that's the difference: Emacs uses the _font_ ascent and descent values, TeX uses the _individual character_ ascent and descent values.