From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grischka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr] Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:38:23 +0100 Message-ID: <52DAADFF.30009@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390063127 7148 80.91.229.3 (18 Jan 2014 16:38:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dak@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 18 17:38:54 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Yv7-00018r-KT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:38:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Yv7-00018T-8c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:38:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Yux-00018J-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:38:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Yuq-0007r2-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:38:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:55991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4Yup-0007qh-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:38:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.47.127.201] ([89.204.130.201]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LeRKD-1VYm0q0Apx-00qFEs for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:38:34 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) Original-References: 87zjmtwqtv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9KQwqP6MvR5j1X0zaU0LTA+NHVbPY8Iw2MkRDfO1mMxmNp3T3my 02KweByLAbBkSK21rNiTrQSFS7EIYKaSi3YKWkGi2HrnOOWI1PkpxLeXUIdaQ5Dw1KPWGqc FDdY8fcViAFjlBkjIa7LpZdNEq6FYNIchMxgYOLHgY5ZddaMzGUcEl/eH2mFi0KE7CqcoJm BTPGsmsH7/uus3S1vn4Ug== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168693 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > If viewed in the grand overall scheme of things, it begs the question if > we are doing Emacs a favor by giving it the piano keyboard more people > think they know how to work with. I don't think the piano keyboard is the problem. It is more the heap of wires and buttons behind it that may look to you like an accordion but really is a 1960s Moog vacuum tube synthesizer. --- grischka