From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: Josh <josh@foxtail.org>
Cc: Brian Jenkins <brian@brianjenkins.org>,
emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
Bozhidar Batsov <bozhidar@batsov.com>,
rms@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:54:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D26662.4050508@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANdFEAFKPWwETi0gppcEHQW-PU0k9hymrkjs4=BcfjV5yf-3qg@mail.gmail.com>
> I originally interpreted your mention of it as additional evidence that
> deciding whether or not to call a new select-window-hook from
> Fselect_window based on its NORECORD argument would be a
> reasonable approach. It sounds like I misunderstood, and that you
> were suggesting simply using the existing b-l-u-h for code that should
> run when the selected window changes non-ephemerally. Is that right?
Both interpretations are valid:
(1) The first interpretation means (implicitly) that we could replace
the call to `buffer-list-update-hook' by calling instead something
we could name `record-buffer-hook'.
(2) The second interpretation means that your function would have to
filter the calls of `buffer-list-update-hook' appropriately.
> As an experiment, I just evaluated this form with `eval-expression':
>
> (progn
> (setq bluh-hist nil)
> (add-hook 'buffer-list-update-hook
> (lambda (&rest args)
> (push (format "%s: %s" (buffer-name) args)
> bluh-hist))))
>
> A few seconds later bluh-hist had grown to contain several hundred
> elements, even though I did not interact with Emacs at all during the
> interim. All of my open buffers appear to be represented in that list,
> including ERC buffers, source code buffers, *scratch*, *Backtrace*,
> etc. I have not yet tried this experiment with -q/-Q so it's possible
> this behavior is being caused by some of my own code or a library,
> but if this expected behavior then b-l-u-h doesn't seem well-suited
> to the problem I'd like to solve.
You didn't explain _what_ you want to solve. Adding the name of the
current buffer whenever a hook is run doesn't sound very reasonable to
me.
Consider the following construct:
(defvar my-window nil)
(defun foo ()
(unless (eq (selected-window) my-window)
(setq my-window (selected-window))
(ding)))
(add-hook 'buffer-list-update-hook 'foo)
Here it beeps whenever the selected window visibly changes. What
more/less do you want/need? If you give me an example where you cannot
apply (2), that is, filter the changes of which window is selected from
the `buffer-list-update-hook'-run function we can always add a new hook
as sketched in (1) above. But obviously not adding a new hook would be
the cheaper solution.
martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-12 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-17 17:50 [PATCH] frame.c: focus hooks Brian Jenkins
2013-11-17 18:29 ` Bozhidar Batsov
2013-11-17 22:25 ` Brian Jenkins
2013-11-17 22:33 ` Drew Adams
2013-11-18 13:24 ` Brian Jenkins
2013-11-18 14:53 ` Drew Adams
2013-11-19 0:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-11-19 8:26 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-11-19 14:10 ` Bozhidar Batsov
2013-11-20 3:10 ` Brian Jenkins
2013-11-18 8:20 ` Bozhidar Batsov
2013-11-18 13:32 ` Stefan Monnier
[not found] ` <CAM9Zgm18uL7+PJ+60NjZqtjZJ6tUV77xUbFhXh7UPwqs==1=hg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-18 14:20 ` Fwd: " Bozhidar Batsov
2013-11-18 14:23 ` Brian Jenkins
2013-11-18 18:44 ` Richard Stallman
2013-11-18 19:49 ` Brian Jenkins
2013-11-19 6:02 ` Richard Stallman
2013-11-19 18:14 ` Brian Jenkins
2013-11-19 18:53 ` Drew Adams
2013-11-20 0:52 ` Brian Jenkins
2013-11-19 23:42 ` Richard Stallman
2013-11-20 0:52 ` Josh
2013-11-20 3:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-11-20 3:36 ` Josh
2013-11-20 7:34 ` martin rudalics
2014-01-09 17:01 ` Josh
2014-01-11 10:25 ` martin rudalics
2014-01-11 19:05 ` Josh
2014-01-12 9:54 ` martin rudalics [this message]
2014-01-14 17:30 ` Josh
2014-01-14 18:10 ` martin rudalics
2014-01-10 17:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-01-11 19:06 ` Josh
2013-11-20 0:53 ` Brian Jenkins
2013-11-20 7:46 ` Jarek Czekalski
2013-11-17 19:28 ` Glenn Morris
2013-11-17 21:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-11-18 4:11 ` Leo Liu
[not found] ` <CADTx1Oy5pUmb9sPU6jm0yt1hJtvgJmfDtZQpeFakmHknhEXE=A@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-18 13:33 ` Fwd: " Brian Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D26662.4050508@gmx.at \
--to=rudalics@gmx.at \
--cc=bozhidar@batsov.com \
--cc=brian@brianjenkins.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=josh@foxtail.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).