From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:59:45 +0100 Message-ID: <52CDCA51.5070201@alice.it> References: <52CB2AB0.4080505@alice.it> <877gachfza.fsf@igel.home> <52CBD5CC.4020804@alice.it> <8761pvvoq1.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83d2k3sqqz.fsf@gnu.org> <52CC2D45.1000908@alice.it> <83a9f7sosr.fsf@gnu.org> <52CC5ED3.2000903@alice.it> <83d2k2fkg1.fsf@gnu.org> <87txdenwz3.fsf@igel.home> <831u0ifh7d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389218414 14494 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2014 22:00:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen.berman@gmx.net, sven.axelsson@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 08 23:00:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W11Ac-00062E-FU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 23:00:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W11Ac-0006Fv-5y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:00:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W11AS-0006Bw-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:00:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W11AL-0004vQ-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp203.alice.it ([82.57.200.99]:29322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W11AD-0004u8-Hp; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:59:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] (87.12.223.137) by smtp203.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as angelo.graziosi@alice.it) id 529A575B062F5CA0; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:59:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <831u0ifh7d.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.99 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167819 Archived-At: Il 08/01/2014 19.42, Eli Zaretskii ha scritto: > Whatever the experts say, I know nowhere near enough about that. The > goal is to let people clone 330MB as opposed to 1.1GB. Indeed.. Why should one clone 1.1 GiB and the repack all in 330 MiB? and shouldn't the remote repository "cleaned" (repacked etc..) regularly? Ciao, Angelo.