From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs completion matches selection UI Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:12:50 +0200 Message-ID: <52B79C22.4090206@yandex.ru> References: <87fvqtg02v.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87a9fylusq.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <878uvizrwz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8761qmkyn1.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87zjnyxdpb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k3f2j7xv.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <2518D79A-B9E4-45DF-A403-8330145DFD17@gmail.com> <87eh58j0x3.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <878uvg4ul2.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y53ghe94.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87vbyk3497.fsf@yandex.ru> <87haa4gw69.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txe4usm1.fsf@yandex.ru> <87zjnvg2t2.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txe364q0.fsf@yandex.ru> <87r497fu0h.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87haa1litl.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y53czx7e.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387764783 16493 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2013 02:13:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 02:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 23 03:13:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vuv14-0003Ig-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 03:13:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vuv13-0004JB-SP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:13:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vuv0v-0004Im-Tk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:13:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vuv0q-0006Ny-In for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:13:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ea0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::233]:45310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vuv0q-0006Nq-Be for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:12:56 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r15so2086001ead.38 for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:12:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NFogskLAcuxwMM+81giWOH1uf4CVKfc/nFcsnRmxkZ8=; b=mrAcz+KSTJA7X+VJ/abIiBxbrXozCYeQB4z5GCmDwyYtkFxuZg622dzfjnkUzdeM6A u2qc2jo7goJXvgdQo7nbRDEjTe1bW9AGk6Di5KVZQlYqfEio2IVYQoIsYDSyApo2g3ZL lLz5WF+KraD9HlXXIN7BwUjP5BY/uGmB3aKlPXDeLrBKdNqr2V4SSp0LVrHQZ2Lqtclv IdPF58lTBIs//iYXnt+Peb7OxvhhZVjGIxh7tlCLuq5VOFvybzGFuTc+0FhI9JxmqQMm Giuckb0EUUEGl9KDG3O0Mwus1rEaHO7XoilhMJdhbLsbB0KF9KM7z0XC2AJS/UOWh0cg uQFA== X-Received: by 10.15.52.73 with SMTP id o49mr15299265eew.60.1387764775517; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:12:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.10.2] (93-2-98.netrun.cytanet.com.cy. [93.109.2.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm41252050eed.14.2013.12.22.18.12.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Dec 2013 18:12:54 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c01::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166756 Archived-At: On 23.12.2013 03:36, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I'll trust your judgment on those issues. But if there are performance > problems with having company-capf in company-backends, it would be very > useful to know it, so please add it by default, so we can fix those > problems (presumably in the respective completion-at-point-functions) > rather than avoid them. Okay, I started on it, and there's a problem: `company-capf' doesn't work in IELM buffers, which will be a regression against https://github.com/company-mode/company-mode/issues/42. Any suggestions for a quick fix? `ielm-complete-symbol' doesn't look like a proper completion function.