From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: managing windows in two frames Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:53:27 +0200 Message-ID: <5229B427.9010303@gmx.at> References: <8561uiclrj.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5225EF0F.1090109@gmx.at> <52260D12.4040002@gmx.at> <5226D26F.7090301@gmx.at> <52274BE9.1010504@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378464828 26853 80.91.229.3 (6 Sep 2013 10:53:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 06 12:53:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VHtfj-00057K-60 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:53:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHtfi-0008ME-RY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:53:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHtfX-000879-Rv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:53:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHtfQ-0007U0-EE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:53:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:51101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHtfQ-0007To-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:53:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.44.93] ([62.47.44.93]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MTTKZ-1VS6Y91iRr-00SMLr for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 12:53:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:A1CKdZk1XCK9RS8UhARIQYcbPL3BXf4f/xzC7wwuK5Ri7TiJ73t b2q+/eux6jX/aJpKslt0DtB1pZ7PYkzxKGGWQsNO68S4SGn7dzlThsNr7JIW/a1hXouxqKw 3kxXr8abaqZimPh3Sdnfn7F1KxChiQ7h8QEoXWJz5arnz7dCi6HvvK4ewU1NHwlFg9gEmw7 XxK4tREiBXIolodQndQTg== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163217 Archived-At: > You can, but that doesn't undo the fact that the user has seen it (and > may have had to place it manually on his desktop). That's the user's problem since in this case she did override your suggestion on not using another frame. But you'd have to tell me more details of why you want to use a function that displays a buffer you don't want to display. Is it because you want to test filling in a hypothetical environment and postpone the decision on where to display the buffer? martin